WolfpackWoman
Inactive
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2010
- Messages
- 399
- Reaction score
- 0
Well--Mr. Cooper, you just got a free appeal if you're convicted. Reversible error by the judge.
Ha, your little trick, Kurtz, did no workee.
Well--Mr. Cooper, you just got a free appeal if you're convicted. Reversible error by the judge.
Well--Mr. Cooper, you just got a free appeal if you're convicted. Reversible error by the judge.
Wow, so if there was DNA evidence linking someone else to the blood under NC fingernails that came to light in the last 24 hours - would you also want that suppressed?
What Kurtz is trying to put over on the Prosecution was wrong. He should have gotten a real expert in the beginning. You do not ambush, and you do not introduce new experts in the middle of a trial.
JMO
What Kurtz is trying to put over on the Prosecution was wrong. He should have gotten a real expert in the beginning. You do not ambush, and you do not introduce new experts in the middle of a trial.
JMO
You don't think what the prosecution did was wrong? They had Mr. Ward's CV and report back in February. They waited TWO FULL months, on the day he was set to testify, to object and file a last minute motion to exclude. You really think that wasn't an ambush against the defense?
And they are currently introducing new experts right now. How does that jive with your statement?
So what was the end result about JW's post. I am sorry I am just tuning in and read above. TIA.
Yes, the posting I think has been presented to the judge.
I think this was a complete trick by Kurtz to enter a witness on purpose late in the game so the state would not be prepared. I think JW posting here was a mistake because it showed he TOLD the defense he was not a forensic expert. Like I said, he shudda not done that. So - sorry, but I agree it was deceptive on the defense's part and the judge ruled.
Night of July 11 BC had a router LE never found.