A big "eh" from a Canadian and welcome to Websleuths.
As a courtesy I am going to give you a little bit of information:
AS A COURTESY I'm GOING to debate you.
Where was the dog during the murders? I have never heard it was in the room.
Water is heard running on the 911 tape and Darlie is supposed to be wetting towels.
I have broken more than one glass and not cut my feet while cleaning it up. I have also cut my feet with broken glass while missing a piece usually days later. This is not proof positive that it is impossible to do so, scientific proof positive are the laws that are considered a proven fact like gravity or the physics of momentum. The evidence is faulty here as I can easily avoid broken glass on a floor if the chunks are big enough.
The vacuum was used like a crutch by Darlie and it moves around the crime scene in photos taken after Darlie leaves in the ambulance so unless she can teleport it ..........Ambulance personnel also moved it according to Darin.
For such a violent struggle, a "very nice and expensive flower" arrangement was "turned over on its side" and undamaged. Not a scene where a women was fighting for her life. The water was unspilled and the flowers were not damaged. That was the only damage to the entire room.
The glass top table was overturned then after it was overturned someone put it back and laid the flowers askew on the table. They were silk and don't need water. Evidence of the blood drop on the table- it clearly shows the table was at an angle towards the ground when the blood hit it and flowed in the direction gravity would pull it- down.
As Darlie was being lead out to the ambulance she never, not once asked about her boys. Her husbands only comment were about her breasts.
You said it yourself her HUSBANDS only comments--, is he a player in this crime in your mind here?
Who ever told you that was incorrect-Darlie did not see her child in the ER that I have ever heard.
According to Darin and the sound of water running on the tape Darlie was the one who got them and wet them and threw them to him. Listen to the 911 tape-Right after the police officer tells Darlie to get a rag-not a towel- a rag, he then tells her to sit down then he changes his mind and tells her to lay down. Being a southern woman I wound ignore the order to get a rag as I wouldn't use a rag for first aid, it is something in my mind I would associate with cleaning and it wouldn't be anything close to sanitary. I would think the officer daft.
Think about this though if you are cleaning up a crime scene you are going to use something to wipe with, a sponge- no blood found on them, paper towels- none found with blood on them- a rag- OMG a golden opportunity the officer wants a rag get him the one I used so he can cover up for me and say this is the rag the defendant brought me and I used to administer first aid. Perfect cover, and I would have realized it the minute the officer reminded me of rags especially if I had been cleaning with one.
What did Darlie use to clean up with, other poster swear none of the towels were wet but with out something besides her hands and water she had to get all the blood off the knife from the first murder because they couldn't find any on it.
You have never seen a person who just stabbed someone or even beat them to death, it is amazing how almost bloodless to the attacker it is. Blood tends to fly away from them unless there is arterial spray and they is no evidence of that here. Cast off occurs in both stabbings and beatings and beatings leave more cast off most of the time. I can tell you from personal experience that I have seen someone before they cleaned up much with blood evidence from a beating still on their clothes. There was not that much and the victim received more blows than the boys suffered together in wounds, the outcome for all was the same -death. Knives are silent, deadly and clean - clean because they leave the killer clean.
Darlie said Darin checked the front door twice before retiring upstairs but it was unlocked when she went to call for her neighbor who was a nurse. It is simple to do what has been discussed as a fireman's jump to exit the fence, many occupations use it and it does not require the person to come into a lot of contact with the fence, 1 foot and 1 hand, I know the police didn't test with luminol every square inch of the fence they did a look see and reported no blood. They didn't even see the bloody hand print on the couch and the destroyed it with luminol so we will never know whose hand or whose blood it was. I doubt they gave much credence to any part of the parents story as they suspected both from the beginning and did not even try to really examine the scene for substantiating evidence.
This was a very disorganized crime scene and in cases where burglary becomes murder this same kind of disorganization is seen, sometimes a few items less valuable than others are taken in the haste of the perp to get away the importance of getting away also makes a perp change their mind about how long they want to hang around.
You never saw her or talked to her after the crime so your theory is based on only partial information given to you. The memorial service before the grave side party showed Darlie crying quite a bit, so much so she was told to get it together as she was going to scare the other kids.
Whoever did it didn't control the youngest child very well as evidence shows he had to be attacked twice. Possibly this is what saved Darlie as the attacker left her thinking he had done enough to control her, possibly right after he slices her neck, but the youngest child is still alive and trying to get away. The perp moves back towards the youngest child and finishes him.
This is where I even call Darlie story a lie, or an assumption on her part. She could not have seen the perp drop the knife, the kitchen island would have been between them, she might have heard it hit the ground if it was dropped but she doesn't report hearing it just finding it and picking it up. A sock was found and the perp could have grabbed one or two items from the laundry basket to wipe the blood from the hands, this would be the bloodiest part of the killer not the clothes, the knife was laid down in the den why not the laundry room too, as the killer bends over to get something out of the basket.
Yes she tells the operator that she picked up the knife after the operator tells her to not touch anything, this is when she starts to obsess about the fingerprints, a symptom of guilt, survivors guilt.
What psych. course did you take? Trauma victims tend to remember things very differently and they recall details later that are important and they notice weird stuff like odors and colors as it is a distraction from the event unfolding. Some women can recall in every detail the face of the rapist and others can not. Every see the movie Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil. The guilty as hades killer never wavers in his story not so much a small detail publicly but privately he is discovered. Darlie has not changed her story in an inconsistent manner, she has clarified points and recalled some details but the main crux has stayed the same the fact that it is isn't memorized and never changing is how truthful people are. People don't even tell a joke the same way twice, your voice inflections change and your timing changes it is a script you know well and desire to share, and still each time you tell it it is a little different. Imagine a traumatic life event- unscripted and trying to tell someone all the details about a very emotional event, you best tell it perfectly with every little detail correct - very soon after the event.
Only when people can distance themselves from a traumatic event can they deal with it, with less confusion and the emotional turmoil it produces.
No such documentation exists as this is a falsehood, the bruises appeared consistently with the time of the crime being the time the bruises were inflicted. The pictures of Darlie are well developed bruises that are healing and have been healing for a few days, all bruises look worse as they get older it is a natural healing process that occurs with all people. The pictures show that Darlie could not have self inflicted the bruises read the testimony of the pathologist who stated that he would have ruled them defense wounds had Darlie been on his slab at the morgue. She didn't die and they doctor who operated on her told two stories at two different times. One to the family right after surgery, that Darlie came very close to a fatal wound, and that she suffered superficial wounds on the stand. His license was in suspect for some reason at that time as well.
The child was able to talk, where do you get that info,? She might have been remembering details as "waking up" as she still can't deal with not being able to save her kids and some evidence that she could have been aspirated- teeth marks inside her mouth on her cheeks. Either of those would account for waking up literally or mentally waking up to record the event as memory.
One of the things we derived earlier was the wounds on the boys show the killer running out of steam so to say. At the beginning the killer used more strength on the oldest child, less on the younger child and the younger child seems to have been attacked twice. His mothers blood is under his on the knife meaning Darlie was bleeding when he was stabbed. Her blood then his blood on top, either she cut herself first then attacked him the second time or he was attacked a second time by the intruder after he had attacked Darlie.
Honey Pie there is concrete under the window not mud, mulch in the garden beds next to the window, and mulch unless soaking wet doesn't leave good foot impressions enough to derive if someone was there or not. The lawyers demonstrated in court how to easily get in and out of the window they went thru the window several times to prove it.
. Read John Douglas books then tell that story he tells a very different one about criminals and how they think.
The knife used to cut the screen was from the INSIDE knife block. So somehow the intruder, gets in the house, gets the knife, goes outside whatever way he came in, cuts the screen with the knife he got from the house and then re-enters and replaces the knife in the knife block. The screen was shown to be cut from the inside.
The screen was cut from the outside the evidence about the screen is the prosecution says a bread knife from the same butcher block as the murder weapon was used to cut the screen and they say the screen was cut from the outside. Fibers from said screen are found on a bread knife however the type of brush they use to test this stuff is made from a similar fiber as the screen fiber. Only a more though break down most likely the chemical analysis of the chemicals used to produce the two fibers can make a positive match or no match to the fibers found on the bread knife.
What are you reading to gain this much misinformation, talk to Goody and Beesy they know the case very well and even they would correct you on some of these facts you are stating
. She made a comment that offended that person obviously -who which friend, if she was a friend how could you let her come back and see any of it, I would be cranky too seeing the scene and how much blood there was, too much of a reminder of what I had lost and gone thru.
. She was never flat when I spoke to her she was in outer space part of it and majorly depressed after. Just like the graveside service/party she was crying a lot then she would get it together and act all OK and encouraging to others that the boys were in heaven. The only time she had joy was when she talked about the boys in heaven. She was trying to deal with it but IMO from my observances of her behavior she was exhibiting major symptoms of depression after the boys deaths. She wasn't too flat around me it was up or down with a calm between the storm before she got it together or lost it again. The periods of time between the two events was getting further apart from days after the funeral to weeks after the funeral.
I don't think you were at the funeral so why so you say that?
Look at the disorganized pattern in this crime.
SHE BLEEDS AT THE SINK NO DUH, she also claims to be wetting towels so naturally she is at the sink we can hear water running on the 911 tape. No evidence exists that she cut herself at the sink only that her blood is in the sink. No drip, drop, smear, or cast off exists around the sink to prove this, we have all wondered where she stabbed her arm and then sliced her own throat. The defense shows her pillow as evidence her throat was cut as the blood found on it is in a pattern that would occur if someone was bleeding from the throat and laying there.
The knife wound to her neck, showed "hesitation" marks. A person who cuts themselves would pull back and "hesitate" because of the pain. A person inflicting these wound would not feel the pain, therefore no hesitation marks.
In order to hesitate on a slice type movement more than one line of entry would be found. How could you pull back then line it back up exactly and go for it again, continuing to cut at the same point you quit cutting look at the photographs of her wounds do you see two different entry points or an attempt to line the wounds up?
What interview? It sounds like you have been fed a huge pile . I would put on some boots and wade out of that quagmire. Some of the things you have stated are pretty left field and your idea of proof is based on false information. Go to the Darlie sites and read the trial transcripts, the testimonies and not these Paperback Writers.
Do you still have the same amount of doubt as you did?
