madeleine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2008
- Messages
- 4,972
- Reaction score
- 88
JR said that in DOI.Truth is,I believe the results were never released.
One thing the R's want ppl to forget is that LE needed 'probable cause' in order to search them in the first place,meaning,IMO,there is a lot more evidence against the R's then we are able to see.
Recall that Patsy said in DOI that LE thought they were using JB as a sexual substitute for herself.To which she said "EWWWW!!!" (or something to that effect).Again,they would have to have a reason or reasons to think this was true.(and we still don't know what the 'spots' were on the pieces of carpet that were removed from near JB's bed.they were never publicly identified.)
Patsy's comment re: the above reminds me of SD saying 'the hit dog barks'.I think Patsy was definitely barking!
Didn't they say those were urine stains?The way ST put's it I understand something else.......((shrug)) If it would have been semen I guess the case would have been closed by now(?)....but since we're dealing with people who give instructions for samples NOT to be tested...........:banghead: you never know
ST/pg 48
"They were also looking for traces of semen,and in the victim's bedroom,ultraviolet light showed stains on the bed and surrounding carpet."