Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And we all sit and wonder why predators are sooo abundant??montana_16 said:Wow, I think they're all bad except for maybe the one where she's eating the fruit.
The top one is wrong in every way and no little girl belongs in a string bikini.
And the one with the two girls, somehow they made that one seem nasty too.
My goodness! Those pictures are bait for pedo's! What message is Cindy sending to her dd? What seems cute to Cindy now won't be when her darling daughter dresses inappropriately in her teens. Clueless Cindy will wonder what made her daughter so promiscuous.luvbeaches said:Wow, what is Cindy thinking????
The top one where she is topless, is totally inappropriate. And I really don't like the one with the string bottoms. It's way too mature for a little girl that age. The ones where she is hugging the other girl, and eating...seem okay. But really, who in their right mind would have their young daughter pose like that???
I hope the tatoo is fake. But even if it is, it's not something that should be on a little girl of that age.
You raise a good point.BirdieBoo said:Well, we all know things are different now, but I seem to remember Jodie Foster's coppertone ad in which she was nearly naked and a dog was pulling her panties down. That was the start of her career.
Brooke Shields was also naked in the media at a young age.
Where do we stop it, though? Pedos are going to find any public pictures of children a turn-on. We don't know enough about pedos to know if they prefer very innocent looking child photos or more sexualized child photos. Probably, it's different from pedo to pedo.Tristan said:I think the picture is beautiful.
Unfortunately, in this day and age, sicko pedophiles will look at
it as sexual, so I would not have allowed it.
If the picture was just to be framed for display in the Crawford/Gerber
home, than it is perfectly appropriate.
I have been told that there is a large segment of pedo population that loves pictures of boys' bare feet. I know a lady in California that has done a ton of research on that.... a couple of years ago, if you googled "boy's feet", you got all kinds of sicko stuff...:hand:southcitymom said:Where do we stop it, though? Pedos are going to find any public pictures of children a turn-on. We don't know enough about pedos to know if they prefer very innocent looking child photos or more sexualized child photos. Probably, it's different from pedo to pedo.
To me, these pics are no more sexual than ones that you see in flyers advertising kids clothing, etc...
I just don't think this child's parents should be castigated. If her child wants to model, pictures are going to be taken. Then the pictures are going to find a public forum because that's why they are taken.