LeLe1953
Former Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2008
- Messages
- 1,862
- Reaction score
- 4
I'm new to this thread and have been lurking around and reading as much as I can. After Casey was indicted, I became concerned that some jury members (especially women) may have a problem sentencing her to life because of her age. I don't even know if there has even been a young woman put to death close to Casey's age.
This may concern an jury member (and there is always one of those on the jury) who feels she is guilty but does not have 100% (body) proof that she did this.
Great question. There are some people who do not believe in the DP EVER & then those of us who do. I think a lot of jurors would have more trouble sentencing a really old person to death. For a middle aged or older person life in prison probably means death. OJ in his recent case could be an example of that. I have heard he could spend the rest of his life in prison.
On the other hand, look at someone young, give them life & you think about how they be out in 25 years. THAT aint life. I personally wouldnt want someone like KC out while she would still be young, in her 40's or so. For me, the age of the criminal, unless under 18, makes no difference. The penalty should be based on the crime. If the evidence proves her guilt the jurors, I hope, would have no problem handing down the DP.