freespeech
Inactive
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2011
- Messages
- 933
- Reaction score
- 5
'Why didnt we collect and process the panties in the trash?'
'....The investigation revealed this item was likely related to a girls slumber party at the mansion in the days leading up to Rebeccas death.'
'Likely', does not confer the use of "science" or "following the evidence" since this piece of evidence was not analyzed after being found in the vicinity of a naked dead woman.
The SDSO did not even bother to elaborate in a logical investigatory fashion on how they "felt it likely" that the underwear did not belong to Zahau. Instead they "guessed" or took hearsay as evidence.
Wouldn't testing the DNA on the underwear been the way to positively rule out whether they belonged to Rebecca? Wouldn't that have been the appropriate "science" to be used with regards to performing a professional and competent investigation?
http://www.sdsheriff.net/coronado/faq.html
'....The investigation revealed this item was likely related to a girls slumber party at the mansion in the days leading up to Rebeccas death.'
'Likely', does not confer the use of "science" or "following the evidence" since this piece of evidence was not analyzed after being found in the vicinity of a naked dead woman.
The SDSO did not even bother to elaborate in a logical investigatory fashion on how they "felt it likely" that the underwear did not belong to Zahau. Instead they "guessed" or took hearsay as evidence.
Wouldn't testing the DNA on the underwear been the way to positively rule out whether they belonged to Rebecca? Wouldn't that have been the appropriate "science" to be used with regards to performing a professional and competent investigation?
http://www.sdsheriff.net/coronado/faq.html