The state didn't prove that, The state has the burden to prove what they claim.
Didn't prove what?
The state didn't prove that, The state has the burden to prove what they claim.
Yes there is, No one threatened him. He started the issue, He shot at a car full of kids that was right next to his car. when they were retreating he continued to shoot at them.
There is no self defense here. None. The law is clear, You have to be in fear for bodily harm/life. He was not. Not in the least. He was in his car, sitting there and picked a fight.
JMO
I'm 50 and I have no Male friends, most are drunk moochers at best. I've given and given until they think I should give then everything, to heck with that.At his age, (or any age?) it's a RED FLAG :moo: when a man (especially one who is married) says that he doesn't have any *best male buddies* that are long term. EVEN MORE OF A HUGE red flag, :moo::moo::moo: if he has NO male friends - therefore no one to stand up for him in court. :seeya:
Completely agree. He has expressed vaguely racist sentiments on the stand and in writings. He had an issue with their "" music. He was scared of their gangster friends coming back for him. And so on. That's just a part of it though.
Only if the jury believes the defendant since he is the only person who felt threatened or saw a weapon.
IMHO, he has a severe credibility problem.
Exactly, which is why I speculated that women with black sons would likely hold him strictly accountable. I think they have a unique perspective on this. My kids are mixed race, half black, half white. So this is a topic of conversation in my daily life.
The state didn't prove that, The state has the burden to prove what they claim.
I guessing the ones who were on probation or brought in shackles have more credibility?!
The only thing that matters is what the PROSECUTION can PROVE!Just listening to Dunn's account, it's not ringing true.
He says he heard Jordan threatening to kill him and asked if he was talking to him. Dunn says Jordan said, yes I'm going to kill you. Then he saw a shotgun. Then Jordan makes a move to get out of the car and goes, "this s*** is going down!"
Okay, normally when people decide to kill you, they just do it, if they're serious. Then, as I've said before all this threatening with a shotgun in his hand and Dun still had time to reach over, open glove compartment, grab his gun, unholster it, turn off safety, *advertiser censored* it and fire? He was coming at him and Jordan still couldn't get a shot in? He was so angry and murderous that even as he was being fired at he didn't shoot back or a fire a shot off?
I mean, come on. How can people believe this?
I agree with that, I even thought about it just now. But I take offense to the idea that the black women will be the ones to not let Dunn off, no matter the evidence, because of emotion. Perhaps they can relate more to the plight and the presumptions that young black men have to deal with. But I still find it a little offensive. It's surely a possibility that they could think that way. But it assumes the black moms have already made their decision and are not going to weigh the evidence just as intelligently as the rest of the jurors.
It's like saying, there's no way the white men on that jury will let Dunn be found guilty because they see themselves in him. They will identify with him and won't vote against him.
Again, I find it presumptuous.
The only thing that matters is what the PROSECUTION can PROVE!
Believe whom you wish to believe, I was right about the states case against Casey Anthony, I was right about the states case against George Zimmerman. I have to believe you think successful white men go around shooting car loads of teenager for no reason all the time.
Stephanie Brown ‏@NewsAndNom 10s
Jury wants to see all of the video at all angles, want to watch tomorrow morning #DunnTrial #MichaelDunn