IBsleuthin
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2008
- Messages
- 2,151
- Reaction score
- 30
We need to remember what LE writes in a search warrant isn't evidence. What appeared to be blood spatter may not have been blood spatter.
If we ever see the test results it could explain what was seen by LE. Until that happens it's just a guess that blood spatter was present. If I were to guess, I would say that it wasn't blood spatter. JMO
It was confirmed as blood splatter and I watched a video with DR and he explains that this blood splatter was found, he admits it was blood splatter and then explains that they received this chest from an aunt and they think the blood was on it when they received it.
Which just makes me go??? because the blood splatter in the search warrant explains that it was there after the chest was placed in the shed for storage.
I'll try to find that link to that video. I tried earlier today and couldn't. It was a 2010 video.