ImnoSherlock
Occasional Poster
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2017
- Messages
- 499
- Reaction score
- 57
You can tell it has been inserted into the pic.Why would the photographer do that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks like a girl behind tobe (looking down so you only see her hair which is in a bun) and a guy in a hat behind her. Her hair is covering his face.No,I mean that jacked up face next to Tobe's face.
No,I mean that jacked up face next to Tobe's face.
It's someone's hair in front of a man's face.You can tell it has been inserted into the pic.Why would the photographer do that?
I have a question for our experts concerning a possible backpack. Does it appear to any of you that BG is carrying a dark backpack on his left side?
I see more shadows and blurring on the left, but it doesn't look like a backpack to me. Then again, I've never seen any animals, goggles, plastic bags, rope, gloves, fanny pack , tool belt, gun or much else. I guess I'm either blind or very unimaginative, or both.
.I have a question for our experts concerning a possible backpack. Does it appear to any of you that BG is carrying a dark backpack on his left side?
.
Here you go Han. If you look very closely it appear the blue from the jacket ends approximately at my yellow line (note, I am no Picasso, so I'm a little off with my line) but you get the general idea of where the blue coat ends and what appears to be a black backpack or something of that nature starts.
I've enhanced the photos from the ISP original. (Not that I'm a professional at that either). :blushing:
All MOO.
.That would make one side incredibly small compared to the other side unless you can think of a way his body was contorted to appear that way?
First just look at where you drew the line and compare it with his other side. Then explain (respectfully I'm not being snarky) how one side of his body would be turned in to show one side smaller than the other?
.
I believe it is because he is turning to the left. To really see where the blue ends and black begins, you would have to take the picture ISP released and then save it to your computer and zoom in on the left arm.
All IMHO.
I think we are looking at a possible stripe ( dark) on the sidearms of that jacket. Here are the two original ISP pictures:
Here are the same pictures with maxed out brightness showing a possible (black?) stripe (red arrows) on both sides of the jacket. I estimated a center line and a distance A that is identical to distance B. If you shift the white center line, you see A and B changing accordingly. Not a big difference IMO. Also, if you further increase the brightness, there is no shoulder strap IMO to indicate a backpack, unless it is just not visible. Having said that, not sure, if the blue arrow area is clothing or something else:
I'll check it out a bit further.
ALL IMO
-Nin
I absolutely think he's wearing a backpack. Early on in the investigation it was mentioned in reference to BG's description, I'm fairly certain, but I'll have to do some digging in the media thread to find it.
It's always looked to me like he's got some type of duffle bag slung over his shoulder—I think it's quite large. At first I could have swore his left hand was up by his face because he was carrying a bag over his shoulder. The flesh colored spots that are supposed to be his hands just don't look natural. I really feel these images have been altered in that area to conceal something only the killer would know (like an unusual weapon, etc...)
The way his hands are supposedly in his pockets is what I can't wrap my head around. Why is one hand down so much lower than the other?? I understand they would shift up/down a little as you took a step with your opposite foot, but his left hand is down so low in every picture! I just can't find my self to buy these pictures at face value implying that his hands are in his pockets. No one looks like that when they walk with their hands in their pockets! Unless he's got like a cargo pant with multiple pockets—some high, some low.
I absolutely think he's wearing a backpack. Early on in the investigation it was mentioned in reference to BG's description, I'm fairly certain, but I'll have to do some digging in the media thread to find it.
It's always looked to me like he's got some type of duffle bag slung over his shoulder—I think it's quite large. At first I could have swore his left hand was up by his face because he was carrying a bag over his shoulder. The flesh colored spots that are supposed to be his hands just don't look natural. I really feel these images have been altered in that area to conceal something only the killer would know (like an unusual weapon, etc...)
The way his hands are supposedly in his pockets is what I can't wrap my head around. Why is one hand down so much lower than the other?? I understand they would shift up/down a little as you took a step with your opposite foot, but his left hand is down so low in every picture! I just can't find my self to buy these pictures at face value implying that his hands are in his pockets. No one looks like that when they walk with their hands in their pockets! Unless he's got like a cargo pant with multiple pockets—some high, some low.