As you see I agree with you. It alone would not be enough to meet the legal standard of continued custody, but it has to be looked at as an additional or complicating factor. Social services is supposed to be governed by one cardinal rule (the best interest of the child) but family reunification has become its mantra. The best interest of the child however usually gets lost in the system somewhere so it becomes the responsibility of the child advocate/Guardian ad Litem/CASA to speak only for the child and his/her best interest.
I want whatever is genuinely best for the sister, but I just can't imagine that a family with so many members, in so many countries, presumably with dual citizenship, wouldn't be considered a flight risk.
The court on Monday is closed to media (from what I have heard from some media sources), but I am not surprised as most family court cases are closed because the goal is to protect the identity of the child.
There are supposed to be church members going, I do not know if they are going as moral support for this girl, or if perhaps one of them has put together a custody plan asking for the child to be placed with them to get her out of a foster home and into the home of someone she knows well, if this is the case I expect a continuance as they do home studies and verify that the prospective home meets standards AND will comply with rules regarding visitation/travel/etc.
Unfortunately, things tend to take time, which can feel like an eternity, but when a child is removed because of something so serious they really do tend to treat everyone like they could also be abusive or neglectful. Meaning, even if LE tells the court that Sini is NOT a POI and they have no reason to believe she was even awake, CPS and the court will likely er on the side of caution, from the people I have seen go through this, there seems to very much be a "guilty until proven innocent" procedure when it comes to a child's safety.
As a side note, they removed a TON of wooden spoons from that home. While we have not been told why they took all the spoons, or any spoon at that, we all know that wooden spoons are often a means of discipline. If this little girl said she gets hit with the wooden spoons when she is "bad" or said something to suggest that a wooden spoon was involved when Sherin went missing, they could use her own statements as a reason to keep her in the system.
From one thing I saw it said that "The Mathews" will be in court on Monday to fight for "their" child. I assume that WM will not be there, but often times orders like "no communication with the victim or family" exclude court appearances, so WM may be there or he may just have a lawyer there on his behalf to suggest whether or not he thinks this child should be with his wife at this time.
http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2017/10/20/parents-missing-richardson-girl-cps/
I also read that the child was only removed from the home when WM made bond and was expected to be returning home. IF that was the reason for her removal -his being free, they could say that he has not attempted contact, is not at the home and is court ordered to stay away from SM and the victims family, and therefore the removal was unnecessary. If a judge agrees that this precautionary measure was unnecessary, Sini could have her child back early this week.
http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2017/10/09/search-missing-3-year-old-richardson-girl/