Jupiter05
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2018
- Messages
- 793
- Reaction score
- 9,359
Totally not relevant to this case.Not saying they did, but what if LE did do something like that to someone? Is there any recourse?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Totally not relevant to this case.Not saying they did, but what if LE did do something like that to someone? Is there any recourse?
You would have to know how she spelled her name to perform that search. No one would spell it that way out the gate. And even if she asked him to repeat the name or how to spell it. It would be easy to still need a couple attempts to get it right.
It is, you’re right! And we deserve an explanation, don’t you think? But we’ll probably never get one, and if we do, it will probably be a lie because that’s the world we live in.I also google everything. I’ve said many times if my google history is ever part of an investigation, I am going to have some questions to answer. However, if my google history includes a woman who ends up murdered just under a year later and while I’m having an affair with her spouse, those questions are going to be well warranted. That’s one heck of a coincidence.
Oh, boy. I imagine how much sympathy you got instead...
About Scott Peterson, the detective said to Amber Frey, "he lies even about his lies". I think it is more that just need for sympathy. Some weirdness that has no name yet.
The reason my ex-liar told me about his "dead" ex was to explain that we looked very much alike, hence he fell in love with me on the spot. I remember him telling me about her "quiet gravesite". And then I met her.
I have a couple of questions. I've asked before, but I didn't really get any answers. Probably because the thread ended. Sorry for duplication. I appreciate all the information and opinions here.
Does the manner in which the girls were murdered, combined with the posed doll photo, imply that the girls were murdered first? I believe it does.
Is NK a good person or a bad person, and will she disappear now or will we be hearing from her again?
Thanks in advance.
Every time I google it multiple spellings of Shanann come up. Maybe not now because there’s so many entries on this case, but if you search people named Shanann Watts on fb, you’ll see, Shannon Watts comes up.thank you her name isn't a common spelling of classic Shannon either. Unless her searches show several attempts.
I think the doll pic doesn’t look good for him, that’s for sure. I want to believe the kids lost their lives because of something other than premeditation, ie Bella walked in while he was killing SW, etc., but that’s just bc it’s hard to believe anyone could be such a monster even though we know that some people are.
I don’t NK is a good person. At all. I still don’t believe without any doubt that she knew he would kill them, but I think she’s morally reprehensible.
I thought it was to protect her from libel... I seem to remember he also specialized in ‘internet’ issues (not the exact wording)...I saw that her new lawyer was specifically a type of lawyer for libel.
That made me think she was perhaps looking after a book deal ( or do an exclusive tell all) to see what she could say legally without being slanderous or libelous, because why else would she get that type of a specific lawyer.
Every time I google it multiple spellings of Shanann come up. Maybe not now because there’s so many entries on this case, but if you search people named Shanann Watts on fb, you’ll see, Shannon Watts comes up.
AND...agree.Thank you. Agree and agree.
No, she was fired back in August, a bout a week after CW’s arrest... she had an office job, something to do with monitoring and safety (?). Hmmm... typed out, that looks pretty ironic...This is a truly heartbreaking case. I’ve read a lot of the posts and may have missed it but do we know what NK job role was/is? I’m assuming she is still employed by them but that has got to be a difficult thing to go back to!
Don’t know. Wish I did. If she wants people to believe her, I think she needs to explain. But it could be a lie. She’ll have to prove it.So why do you think she out-of-the-blue one day googles her name?
Maybe she (NK) was interested in CW and heard a reference to a wife, or someone named Shanann in his life, and googled it. She found he was married and moved on, hence; the passed time. Then, much later, there was some interest or interaction at work (he walks into her office and introduces himself) and the dance begins.It’s because so much time passed between that first search and the next one. If she was that interested in CW, you’d think there would be more. At least, I do.
It is, you’re right! And we deserve an explanation, don’t you think? But we’ll probably never get one, and if we do, it will probably be a lie because that’s the world we live in.
I was “the other woman”. Had my now husband of 20 yrs stayed in the home hemming and hawing I would have left.I feel like you’re going out of your way to find the zebra in the room and I’m not sure why.
Maybe she (NK) was interested in CW and heard a reference to a wife, or someone named Shanann in his life, and googled it. She found he was married and moved on, hence; the passed time. Then, much later, there was some interest or interaction at work (he walks into her office and introduces himself) and the dance begins.
I think he saw in her something that he was familiar and comfortable with. She was self assured and likely controlling. He probably thought she was the perfect replacement and he would continue to be taken care of just like he always has.I respectfully disagree. I see devious planning with this one. Everything she does seems well thought out in advance.
disturbing
What did they have in common besides sex and her programming his apps?
I was “the other woman”. Had my now husband of 20 yrs stayed in the home hemming and hawing I would have left.