razzledazzle
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2014
- Messages
- 2,043
- Reaction score
- 9,037
So help me if MSM gets this thread shut down.....
Are you asking about Knoxville? No it came from CBS news.Could there be a connection to this town where the news organization is located???
The key element of my comment was the fact that there was a period of time Kelsey was merely ‘missing’ not murdered. So why the high stakes strategies about preserving custody at that point? Strikes me as very, very odd...One point that I made before is, we don’t know that CB even made a request to see the baby. If I’m CB, I’m doing the smart thing and waiting a little while longer to get custody spelled out by the court. It was only a month. It’s not like she was used to seeing K every day or even every month.
And a public place versus a private one, same diff. You still have the risk of absconding. LE shows up, asks to see the custody papers, and there aren’t any. Not a good situation for either side to put themselves in, and so I don’t think either side tried. JMHO
Some of the worst reporting on any case I've seen, & I've been following this stuff for 20+ years. My high school journalism teacher is shrieking in horror from the newsroom in the afterlife right now.
Someone in a newsroom saw "disposing" and filled in the blank with body instead of, you know, actually reading the darn thing and seeing it was a phone that was possibly disposed of.
I wonder if it was a word for word article with the only change "body" from "phone"?Or the story was ready and waiting for more confirmations from sources and someone accidently posted it.
The incorrect headline and the horrid grammar suggest that it should have gone to the editor rather than the publisher. MOOI’m wondering if they had the story ready to go and it wasn’t supposed to publish yet
I agree - if nothing was wrong except the missing mom - why keep her family from seeing the baby? IMO he had a reason and we now know what it was.The key element of my comment was the fact that there was a period of time Kelsey was merely ‘missing’ not murdered. So why the high stakes strategies about preserving custody at that point? Strikes me as very, very odd...
I stand by my feeling this has got a Jodi Arias vibe. Some women will do ANYTHING for a man. So sickening IMO
Yeah, it seems FB is light years ahead of reporting on this case.I’m wondering if they had the story ready to go and it wasn’t supposed to publish yet
Respectfully, “PF or his family” is unnecessarily lumping them together as if they are one. They are not. This concerns custody on behalf of either SF or the sister, not PF.I do not believe it’s in the best interest of the child to have a relationship with PF or his family - at this time. Anyone willing to murder is not a good influence and if his family is proven to have assisted or influenced him - they are NOT in the best interest of child. Obviously the judge and TCDHS agrees - and the fact that the judge and TCDHS did NOT give F family any visitation says a lot about what has been found and/or is “suspected” about PF and his family in the death of KB. JMO.
Right, so who is the source that spilling?? It ain’t great investigating by one gal.Yeah, it seems FB is light years ahead of reporting on this case.
I'm sure there's lots of A team reporters following on fb now.
So far much of the fb "gossip" has come true.
I just have a really bad feeling that it is true, and just released early. Just a gut feeling, chills basically. I guess we just wait and see what comes next