I’m still finding it surprising that some can’t see the link between flashing, voyeurism & stealing sex toys with sexual assault and murder!
PR does not need to be a master criminal OR very clever to have done what he did ! There is no giant leap to murder because these paraphilic behaviours are already linked. It’s a natural progression! (For those that choose to follow this path)
He only needed motive and opportunity,..
I actually think that to stalk someone requires at least some degree of smarts & skill - I wouldn’t have a clue where to start.
The first ever case found guilty through the use of DNA in the U.K. was that of Colin Pitchfork.
He had exposed himself over 1,000 times before he attacked a young girl, just his second victim was attacked AND murdered.
Double child killer denied parole
Who’s to say PR hasn’t attacked women before ? We certainly know he was prolific in the exposure stakes, of what has actually been reported. The question then would be why did he progress to murder when not all men that display these paraphilic behaviours do? I absolutely hate to discuss this but I feel Libby was either murdered to silence her as a witness as he grew in confidence or deducing from PR’s sexually deviant behaviour - erotophonophilia, which I can’t bring myself to discuss. Just trying to highlight the obvious linkage of his behaviour and murder like many, many convicted men before him.
I think his intent was present, even if it was in his subconscious.
Edited to add, that pitchfork was very recently spotted on day release in Bristol.