oceanstarryeyes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2018
- Messages
- 1,954
- Reaction score
- 11,690
.
None that have been reported but that's a question on the list we compiled for reporters. The email addresses are in the media thread if you'd like to help get answers to questions like that one. (Forgive me if you have reached out to the media already, I don't know.) MOODoes anyone know if there have been subsequent searches after the initial search time frame?
Per dbdb11's sister, RT said he called about noon. Per the dispatch log, the call came in at 3:26 p.m.I am not sure what time RT called 911 to report BT missing, but think I have read people alluding to it being suspicious that he didn't call right away. Imho, calling right away would have made him seem much more suspicious. LE knows what the usual timeframe is for calling in missing persons under such circumstances, and if it varied greatly from that without some kind of a weird explanation, I think it would act as a red flag for them. jmo. (Is that correct that he told the relatives he'd gotten concerned around noon and called 911, but the report says it was actually hours later? - if so, that is a red flag to me in itself.)
That's quite a discrepancy! I wonder why he would have stated such a different time? Has he said at what time she actually became separated from him?Per dbdb11's sister, RT said he called about noon. Per the dispatch log, the call came in at 3:26 p.m.
Dispatch Call Log – San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department
7/12/2019 3:26:24 PM CR CR191930018 CRR1900230 MISPER NAT 936** HIDDEN HILLS RD, KEL
BBM:I am not sure what time RT called 911 to report BT missing, but think I have read people alluding to it being suspicious that he didn't call right away. Imho, calling right away would have made him seem much more suspicious. LE knows what the usual timeframe is for calling in missing persons under such circumstances, and if it varied greatly from that without some kind of a weird explanation, I think it would act as a red flag for them. jmo. (Is that correct that he told the relatives he'd gotten concerned around noon and called 911, but the report says it was actually hours later? - if so, that is a red flag to me in itself.)
3:23 PM Tuesday now at my home in AZ; same time as California. 6:23 AM Wednesday in HK right nowThat's quite a discrepancy! I wonder why he would have stated such a different time? Has he said at what time she actually became separated from him?
ETA: I have no idea the time diff btwn San Bernardino and HK, but is it possible RT could have been translating the time of his 911 call into HK time for the relatives?
BBM:That's quite a discrepancy! I wonder why he would have stated such a different time? Has he said at what time she actually became separated from him?
ETA: I have no idea the time diff btwn San Bernardino and HK, but is it possible RT could have been translating the time of his 911 call into HK time for the relatives?
How well does sound travel there where they were, in the desert?
The dispatch log would have been the time that LE was dispatched, not arrived. Meaning RT's call to 911 was at 3:26 pm. The closest station to the location is approximately and hour away in Needles.Called around noon and Le arrived around 3:30
We actually don't know when they arrived.No witnesses at all that we know of. There may have been witness camping or driving by but we have no report of any person speaking up.
Just RT words and body language to go by.
We do know what time LE was called by RT and what time they arrived for the first search.
jmo