If true, as you say, then are references by LE to podcasts being not even close to the truth simply a ruse? Or is there something else missing, something else in the podcasts that is not accurate? If so, then what? If not to question the sequence of events, then what would it be that is so wrong in the theories generally accepted and/or espoused?
Also, I see nothing incompatible with the 'facts' from LE, when they state the girls were killed 'minutes' after the video, AND the possibility they were driven from the bridge area the 10 or 12 minutes to the cemetery, forced down the hill from there and murdered where they were found.
What is the length of 'minutes' anyway? 2 minutes, or 20? It makes a difference, and I see no reference to a definitive timeline regarding such.
Yes, I understand it was stated by LE they crossed the creek. However, is it clear they crossed from bridge side to CS side? Or did they make a run for it from cemetery side? Or is LE wrong, as they seem to have been once before, in what I believe to be a rather BIG way, regarding the sketches of the perp(s)? Are they supposing an article of clothing in the creek, or a shoe on one side, or the other, is proof of crossing? Could such items not been thrown? We simply do. not. know.
I guess for me to be absolute in my belief that it was end of the bridge, down the embankment, through the wooded area, cross the creek to the murder scene, I'd almost have to have the evidence in hand, you know, the photographs of the footprints of all three indicating the fact. Maybe that evidence exists, it's just, I haven't seen it.
Sure I tend towards the 'standard' scenario in my belief, but so much doesn't jive in this case, I'm willing to explore, and listen to, alternative theories. For the record, all current theories have yet to nab the killer(s) yes?
It's sad, all this seeming evidence, video, voice recording, supposed tracking, references to dna, state, local, federal LE, the works.....yet no arrest.
All opinion and speculation on my part, for sure