I will first say that I have not really followed the Evansdale case, only as discussions related to Delphi. I know nothing about earlier discussions about a carwash. But...
I snipped this info from an earlier post:
“They were the only two people to go by on bikes that day to my knowledge,” said Joe Pahl, who alerted police about the video July 16. “I’ve watched it.”
Pahl is the manager of Cornbelt Auctions, 3520 Lafayette Road, where a 24-hour camera captured the footage from its position behind the building. The time and date stamp — 12:11 p.m. July 13 —“
And I found this info and map:
On the map, the red circled building is 3520 Lafayette Road in Evansdale, the building referenced above with the security camera video that saw the girls pass on bikes. The camera was behind the building so
the girls must have been riding on Brovan Blvd. The blue circled building is Kavalier Car Wash. Not very far away and not a stretch to figure the girls rode by it either before or after the security camera. My guess is that is why the car wash was part of the discussion at some point. As mentioned I know nothing about what that discussion entailed.
So...I kinda think a “carwashes and trestles” discussion is warranted.
But were the bikes found there? That's the statement I have a problem with.
I don't know whether the victims in that case were abducted from the a nearby car wash, the auction house, their driveway, or Meyers Lake - and in fact, I don't think anyone but LE really knows this at this point - BUT what I take issue with is the statement that their bikes were found at a car wash.
Their bikes being "found" at a car wash is contrary to what LE and MSM say and so is a non-factual statement.
By stating falsely that they were, it makes a slight, tenuous connection (that they may have been riding in the vicinity of a car wash) seem MUCH stronger and persuasive than it really is.
JBC could be responsible for both of these cases - no doubt he is evil enough - but we should be discussing this based on what is factual, not what is an overinflation of the facts and contrary to LE's statements.