I get some people thinking that just the word of the members of the S household saying the man in the video is DM isn't enough for them to believe it is DM. I get that. But that is
not what is happening here in this case. His charges are not the result of two people who the general public doesn't care for saying "that's the guy"
This idea that experienced LEOs and investigators trained in technology and video forensics haven't watched the video of the abduction, cleaned it up to remove more of the graininess, and ALSO feel confident that the abductor is indeed DM, quite literally confounds me.
A frame job would have to include not only the people who first gave police DM's name, but would thereafter have to include police officers, investigators, states attorneys/prosecutors, etc. ALL of whom have presumably seen the video (probably a much better quality one than the one we public have) and have moved forward with laying the charges they have.