The mental health evaluation of Letecia Stauch is still not complete after months of waiting, according to an El Paso County judge.
gazette.com
Letecia Stauch hearing delayed again, judge makes 'unorthodox' move
The mental health evaluation of Letecia Stauch is still not complete after months of waiting, according to an El Paso County judge.
The lack of a complete mental health evaluation from the Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo means the case can't continue, and a new hearing date must be set.
"Nothing can be done, and the case can't move forward without this report," Judge Gregory Werner said in court Thursday afternoon.
Stauch is accused of having killed her 11-year-old stepson, Gannon, in 2020.
Instead of setting a new hearing date, Judge Werner opted instead to wait until the mental health evaluation is complete to set a new date, something Werner described as "unorthodox."
Neither District Attorney Michael Allen nor Stauch's defense attorney Joshua Tolini objected to not setting a new hearing date.
Werner said that the hearing would be set out a minimum of two weeks after the mental health evaluation is received, to give family of the victim time to make travel arraignments to be in court.
Tolini did, however, express his desire to file for a show cause hearing if the doctors responsible for the mental health evaluation at CMHIP don't send information they have thus far to the defense, something which was agreed upon at the previous court hearing in June if the evaluation wasn't complete.
If a a request for a show cause hearing is filed it would require a CMHIP representative to appear in Colorado's 4th Judicial District Court and show cause for why the evaluation continues to be delayed.
Tolini indicated he would file for a show cause hearing on Wednesday if he does not receive documents from CMHIP.
District Attorney Allen disagreed with the need for a show cause hearing and described it as "going off on a tangent."
Werner, though, said himself that if the mental health evaluation is not completed soon that he would like for the doctor responsible for the evaluation in court "regardless."
[…]