MOO: He'll plead guilty. In part to spare his family the agony of a trial in which details of his life and crime(s) are bound to be revealed.
I don't think he saw her, either. if he had seen her I don't think he would have left her alive.
No it was not redacted. It was an inadvertent scan of the back of page 1 that had been included in the original PDF (they’ve since corrected the PDF). It just happened to come when the discussion of finding Ethan’s body split between pages 1 and 2 so some people assumed it was something about him redacted.
Not really.
Both really.
The way I'm seeing it now, X is up and about, BK enters the house and steps into the living room area; X sees him, backs up toward the bedroom and tries to arouse E. By this time, though, he's right on her, and stabs her before she can do anything else. He then enters the bedroom, stabs E (who might not even be awake, depending on the circumstances) and then moves upstairs, stabs the two sleeping girls (this is where the dog starts barking, making the commotion that D describes as someone playing with the dog), comes downstairs, sees that E is still alive, dispatches her (making some sort of statement in the process), then leaves. Perhaps he sees D sticking her head out the bedroom door; perhaps he's too zoned out to notice her, but at the very least he's thinking he's done enough mayhem and caused enough ruckus that somebody (maybe even D) is calling the authorities, so he gets while the getting is good. Note that he's said to have driven away at a high rate of speed, which is consonant with his fearing capture, and not a very discrete thing to do.
www.deseret.com
IMO a single snap has 2 pieces. IMO the top would be the snap part with the bulge and the bottom would be where the bulge snaps into.
IMO one of the victim's struggled and fought with him and in so doing pulled the sheath of his belt. Is this possible, in your opinion, since you own one.
Inarticulate people. I suspect they are intending to mean the inside (male) component of the snap, as opposed to the outside (female) component.
Agree, there is one snap to hold the knife in the sheath and a lot of the leather sheaths just double the back leather over to create a loop. Really ungainly to have that thing flapping on the thigh. Commandos, like he wanted to be often attach the fighting knife to shoulder straps of packs or LBE.
I must have missed something because I'm not sure if this is referring to a claim that the knife belonged to his father that I've missed or something else, but in general I don't think someone would notice a random knife missing. First, this is a very large knife that people aren't normally carrying around daily so it would be stored somewhere most likely. Also, a lot of people have a lot of knives or other similar gear that they never use and would never notice it was missing unless they just happened to go looking for it.
Why should the father notice….? Genuinely asking, as I haven’t heard anything to indicate the father had any kind of relationship (past or present) with that knife and it just generally doesn’t seem like a dad would care that much about monitoring his 28 year old son’s possessions?
Somewhere up above, there was a statement saying that other employees there do not recall ever seeing BK as a customer there!
. Of course, I can't find it now.
Yes, the knife that had his father's dna and also the insigna on the sheath. I could be wrong of course, but how many big knives like that would someone have. Once the details of the crime have come out and implicated BK, then I would think the father would look for the knife. I guess that is what "I' would do.
