seagull65
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2008
- Messages
- 2,667
- Reaction score
- 0
What makes you think they didn't investigate him?
I certainly hope they did, but then that would be in normal world, not bizarro world.
What makes you think they didn't investigate him?
I've never attacked the man and I think he probably only found the body. He should have no trouble standing up to normal, routine investigation as would occur in any normal investigation, or discussion on this forum, which is supposed to be an impartial forum for discussion of the Caylee Anthony case, not a prosecution-only forum.
The rule is only that we are not to use last names or expose private information that is not a matter of public record. It would make no difference if the man had brought forward the subject of his record, if he was ever under suspicion for kidnapping and later was cleared and it was expunged from his record, that is a matter of public record. My post was a response to someone posting that this thread should actually be closed because discussion of this man was somehow improper!
If this forum is not for impartial and open discussion of the case, there would be no point in it being here on websleuths.
I'll let your rude comments about me go.
I think anyone from the defense team is going to try to go after Kronk with a vengence for finding her. They did NOT want her to be found (at least, by the outside world!). They are angry because it has messed up their Caylee is Alive case for reasonable doubt they had worked so hard for. The defense is going to rip this meter reader to shreds in the media. It is a sad thing when someone finds a little girl (I don't care how he knew to look there or if he is a darn psychic), but then his reputation gets dragged through the mud because of it.
I am concerned what it is going to do in other missing persons cases in the future. Will people find their bodies and run the other way instead of calling LE? How many families will go without knowing what happened to their loved ones because of this? What kind of precedence has this set now that the man, who obviously did NOT have anything to do with the disappearance or murder of the child, came forward only to be torn to shreds and thrust into the circus like he has? It is horrific! :furious:
That is wrong. It is not a matter of public record, it has been EXPUNGED!!!
I don't think anyone thinks discussion of the man is improper, but some of us are concerned that he is being accused of crimes he apparently did not commit, like exposing genitals in public and kidnapping. Do you think it's nice to be attacking him for peeing in the bush in these circumstances and suggesting he is some sort of pervert for exposing his genitals? Have you never known a normal law-abiding person to pee in the woods....ever, as a parent, had to pull over to the side of the road to let someone in the family out of the car to pee?? I'm pretty sure my mom had to do it once or twice too...maybe they should have arrested my whole family and many families across america?
Uh, I wasn't talking about using cadaver dogs in routine employment inquiries! I was talking about a person who worked as a meter reader in the neighborhood where a toddler is thought to have been murdered or kidnapped, or at least her body placed there after death, police investigation to "clear" this individual and/or his vehicles (I don't know for example, if he was the only one who did this route or used this vehicle during the time frame in question.) Add to that that this individual is also the one who found the body. These factors alone are enough for the individual to warrant routine investigation. Normally a person would be looked into simply because they found the body, not to mention the unusual circumstances about the find, he found it, LE still couldn't find it, none of the searches had found it, etc. Again, I don't suspect that he was involved in any crime or doing anything other than his civic duty in reporting the find, but I don't see how he could be cleared without investigation, that would be a kind of strange exclusion.Cadaver dogs in homes are hardly routine employment inquiries.
Bunny he revealed the information voluntarily to his employer and to the media. He chose to go public on his own about his identity in the first place. He is not trying to hide it and he is willing to reveal it to public scrutiny. If he is not afraid you should not be either.
This being done by choice.
That is wrong. It is not a matter of public record, it has been EXPUNGED!!!
I don't think anyone thinks discussion of the man is improper, but some of us are concerned that he is being accused of crimes he apparently did not commit, like exposing genitals in public and kidnapping. Do you think it's nice to be attacking him for peeing in the bush in these circumstances and suggesting he is some sort of pervert for exposing his genitals? Have you never known a normal law-abiding person to pee in the woods....ever, as a parent, had to pull over to the side of the road to let someone in the family out of the car to pee?? I'm pretty sure my mom had to do it once or twice too...maybe they should have arrested my whole family and many families across america?
What he revealed publicly was that he had been charged and the records expunged. People were nice enough to post the law re expungement on this thread, and we all know what it means. He is not and was never tried for these crimes, and apparently with good reason. However, people here seem to be suggesting that because he was charged, he must have done something wrong. I don't agree with that.
But of course, you are the mod, and if you think the posts are ok, i will zip it and deal with them!
Uh, I wasn't talking about using cadaver dogs in routine employment inquiries! I was talking about a person who worked as a meter reader in the neighborhood where a toddler is thought to have been murdered or kidnapped, or at least her body placed there after death, police investigation to "clear" this individual and/or his vehicles (I don't know for example, if he was the only one who did this route or used this vehicle during the time frame in question.) Add to that that this individual is also the one who found the body. These factors alone are enough for the individual to warrant routine investigation. Normally a person would be looked into simply because they found the body, not to mention the unusual circumstances about the find, he found it, LE still couldn't find it, none of the searches had found it, etc. Again, I don't suspect that he was involved in any crime or doing anything other than his civic duty in reporting the find, but I don't see how he could be cleared without investigation, that would be a kind of strange exclusion.
Why were cadaver dogs limited to the Anthonys home and car trunk? If they're good enough for the A's, they should be good enough in general to examine any logical areas for any potential evidence trail. Why wouldn't they be used? They charge too much?
I think there is a thread on the cadaver dogs so I won't get into that here.Uh, I wasn't talking about using cadaver dogs in routine employment inquiries! I was talking about a person who worked as a meter reader in the neighborhood where a toddler is thought to have been murdered or kidnapped, or at least her body placed there after death, police investigation to "clear" this individual. Add to that that this individual is also the one who found the body. You don't even have to get into his record, it's already enough for the individual to warrant investigation. Normally a person would be looked into simply because they found the body, not to mention the unusual circumstances about the find, he found it, LE still couldn't find it, none of the searches had found it, etc. Again, I don't suspect that he was involved, but I don't see how he could be cleared without investigation, that would be a kind of strange exclusion.
Why were cadaver dogs limited to the Anthonys home and car trunk? If they're good enough for the A's, they should be good enough in general to examine any logical areas for any potential evidence trail. Why wouldn't they be used? They charge too much?
I only had one sister.My husband was one of six boys.We have 4 boys and 3 girls.The boys [and men] all pee in the woods and the girls [and woman] are all disgusted.It has nothing to do with exposing themselves and everything to do with convenience. They learn it young .
The discussion can be whether or not this has any bearing on his find.
I think it doesn't, you think it doesn't but others may think it does.
His arrest was expunged, he did not need to reveal it. he chose to in an effort to show that he is clean and has nothing to hide regarding his character.
Some may choose to believe it some may not. I suspect he is well aware of that.
It is a legitimate to ask and wonder if this will have any bearing on anything with regards to his testimony or statements to LE.
In my opinion it will not have any bearing on anything and he came forward to insure that it didn't.
I think there is a thread on the cadaver dogs so I won't get into that here.
The point is...as I said early on after Kronk found her body...LE and the FBI are responsible for investigating and clearing the person. They also are the ones to confirm he had NO involvement in the disappearance or murder. They have said this in many ways!
Casey is the ONLY perp charged with the murder of her child. They believe she acted alone and that it was not done accidently. Can it be more clearly stated that Kronk is innocent of any wrongdoing in this case?!
You are right. The only thing that could be proof of anything is if he had been convicted. A charge alone proves nothing and is irrelevant.
I think there is a thread on the cadaver dogs so I won't get into that here.
The point is...as I said early on after Kronk found her body...LE and the FBI are responsible for investigating and clearing the person. They also are the ones to confirm he had NO involvement in the disappearance or murder. They have said this in many ways!
Casey is the ONLY perp charged with the murder of her child. They believe she acted alone and that it was not done accidently. Can it be more clearly stated that Kronk is innocent of any wrongdoing in this case?!
really?
casey hasn't been convicted yet...
ITA. I feel so sorry for him....losing one's wife is hard enough, then getting thrown into this....I hope he has a good support network to help him through it all and hope he is eventually recognized as being the hero that he is!
really?
casey hasn't been convicted yet...
I think people feel he is a hero because he did not let it go seagull. he reported it over and over. Not many people would do that and from that standpoint he put himself in the line of fire, subject to scrutiny,suspicion and topic of discussion. It was worth it to him because he felt this was important.I still don't get how accidentally finding a body makes a person a hero, but that's just me.