Their "insertions" have been ridiculously specific in an ongoing murder trial and his brother appearing on national tv this a.m. when he knew his brother was going to testify in a couple of hours calling the credibility of the witness he would be rebutting into question? Yeah, no.
Every single thing I've seen about them, from their involvement in PPL and their personal history, CH's evolving motivational speaker bullchit, their calling Travis privately aside for an hour and a half to dis Jodi while she was a guest in their home WITH Travis and had been a welcome guest in the past...just totally inappropriate and weird. You don't like her, don't invite her to your house. She does something while she's there that you don't like...if it's serious, out the door with both of them pronto....if it's not so serious have the freaking conversation on the phone after they leave. Imo, they are ALL a bunch of freaks.
Just kinda bouncing off your post.
ALL the characters "insertions" and "assertions" are quite bizarre. Let's not get into the "O Holy Night" crap, or Arpaio's opinion, or scary Donavan or the "Jodi Arias is Innocent" web site.
Seems BOTH sides have jumped on the crazy train. JA's mother even filed the jury misconduct report.
As far as GS goes, it appears that Juan already was well aware of his reputation because of GS's REPEATED calls to their office. I'm not gonna go into his reaction with him being mad or surprised or whatever. BUT, IMO, it bugged him. Being what we perceive as "ignored" would most likely bother a good number of us. IMO, maybe he felt "left out" or "why aren't they asking ME anything??" Again, him thinking "I knew TA, I knew JA....why am "I" not part of this??". All just IMO.
I KNOW I'm STILL trying to figure out where the financial info came from, and the hour and a half discussion. So, I'm ignorant of THOSE things. Please, someone, anyone get me a link or a video, or the transcript of this....Puuulease??? Bueller??? Bueller??? I keep asking for it....sorry.
NOW..."freaks""??? Involvement in PPL....motivational speaker BS....history???
That's confusing me, as well. I don't know about most people, but at some of the positions I've held, in huge world wide businesses, there's a bunch of those "cheerleader" type of people they bring in. It's for moral, boolah-boolah type of stuff. Like a pep rally. They'd come in and "teach" us how to "do better" "be better"....yada yada yada....basic BS to get the employee's to be more company oriented, increase productivity....what.ever.
And we weren't sales divisions...we were product development and chemists, etc.
As far as the whole TA being away from JA at the gathering....who knows??? Some could have been warning TA, some could have said about money, who knows??!!!
The point is, being poor hosts and showing poor etiquette, etc....has never been a form of "abuse", IMO. Being a bunch of caddy gossips, tongue wagers, nib nozers, acting like prepubescent girls, etc, shows bad manners and rudeness...freaks???
Why didn't JA ask to be driven home?? Why didn't SHE pull TA aside and ask what's up??? Why didn't SHE give TA a good tongue lashing for leaving her alone???
If SHE decided to ACCEPT all that, then SHE'S the "freak"!!!
I'm confused how RUDENESS becomes "abuse"??? How being gossiped about or warned about to TA or being concerned about their profits, etc becomes abuse???
AGAIN, IMO.