whatif?
Member
- Joined
- May 10, 2012
- Messages
- 116
- Reaction score
- 3
Did any members attend court today? Any going tomorrow?
Yes I'll be there tomorrow Knowledgethirsty. Looking forward to it.
Did any members attend court today? Any going tomorrow?
Yes I went today but am working again tonight and I have to complete some domestic duties so will post later I went from around 3.15 onwards saw GBC three times.
Yes always though it was a bit sus that it was "discovered" at the 11th hour just before the the bail hearing and seemed to be used to strengthen the suspicion that there were accessories afoot!
Were you there when the blond woman came in and told him she hated him?
If so what are your thought on it.
I do agree, but I'm pretty sure they actually relied on it as evidence in the first bail hearing - not a good look unfortunately.
Yes, I am pretty sure the disproven face time call was not hushed up... so many people already knew about it.
Marly, I do recall you said you'd read in the CM about the Face Time call being disproven. It was not posted on the CM website but was available as hard copy. I was hoping that you would have scanned the article and posted it here for us.
No I wasn't there for the outburst but i did see her there later but only found out on the news that it was her..
I mentioned the face time call not being allowed to be used....I was told by a friend, and said it was rumour......but a few of my rumours have come true.
As someone else also mentioned. (my rumours ):banghead::jail:
From memory this "facetime call" was found at the last minute before the first bail hearing. It was believed to be evidence and was presented as such. No one has done anything unethical or corrupt. Further investigations revealed the software error and it was documented and given to the defence.
But surely if they wanted to set the record straight they would vigorously and strenuously deny that it happened and "grant" the police an interview to put their side forward. All I can see from the bc side is muddied waters designed to confuse and deflect whereas in contrast, the Dickies transparency has been crystal and painfully (for them) clear. As has been said many times, if they thought their son was entirely innocent they would be forthright in their dealings with police and media and make public protestations, they are not doing this however because they do not know this for sure.........thus the evasiveness and hiding. And in this same vein, one other sleuther asked where in history did an innocent man retain a barrister 30 minutes after he reports his wife missing......?
Thanks all for the updates today. SM and Snails or others can you provide an online link to the news about today?
To Lychee, my news is not a sound byte.
Special thanks also today to Ali and Doc.
Does it matter about the face time call? The phone was still put on charger around 1.48am.... when Gerard was apparently fast asleep.
Thanks Strangeworld. It's odd that she would say to GBC "I don't love you, I hate you." If that is in fact what she said. Anyway good on her! :twocents:
Here is a twitter link to the ten news story. I hope it works.
TEN News Queensland ‏@tennewsqld
BADEN-CLAY COMMITTAL http://fb.me/2qfb0NR85
But who did this? Could it have been Allison checking his phone? 5 people in the house!
I think Allison was quite possibly lying under the Kholo bridge by this time if we are to believe all the witness accounts of screams and thuds and dogs howling in the Brookfield and Anstead areas.But who did this? Could it have been Allison checking his phone? 5 people in the house!