Sleuth_Noob
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2021
- Messages
- 338
- Reaction score
- 697
Unraveled thread hereHas anyone opened a forum/thread on "Unraveled" yet? I think we're off track on this thread.
Unraveled thread hereHas anyone opened a forum/thread on "Unraveled" yet? I think we're off track on this thread.
Yes thank you, I sometimes get lost in all of these forums/threads, lol.
You are reading it all wrong
Blaming it on a dead guy is exactly what I predicted before it appeared on Blog Boards. I was very pleased with myself by making this prediction. But something happened to change that: That being Spota exonerated him. And that changed my view 180. What I think happened is the cops were frustrated with whAT was going on and the cops put out Bissets name. I believe Spota had to get Bisset out of it like he did with Brewer because both of them would lead back to Burke in some manner. As far A I am concerned it tells me something is very wrong. Consider that Spota is going to jail for covering up for Burke it should make everyone what the hell is wrong with this picture.
Current SCPD Head Geraldine Hart confirms that it was in fact Spota that was responsible for blocking the FBI from being part of LISK investigation in the new LISK podcast “Unraveled”. Here is link to the websleuth thread for this new podcast: Unraveled: new LISK podcast with Chris Loeb interviewsYou are reading it all wrong
Blaming it on a dead guy is exactly what I predicted before it appeared on Blog Boards. I was very pleased with myself by making this prediction. But something happened to change that: That being Spota exonerated him. And that changed my view 180. What I think happened is the cops were frustrated with whAT was going on and the cops put out Bissets name. I believe Spota had to get Bisset out of it like he did with Brewer because both of them would lead back to Burke in some manner. As far A I am concerned it tells me something is very wrong. Consider that Spota is going to jail for covering up for Burke it should make everyone what the hell is wrong with this picture.
So maybe they were into something and the bottom was about to drop out. I still don't think Bissett has anything to do with LISK, other than being a convenient scapegoat for some people. Hey, blame it on the guy who offed himself. It's not like he can declare his innocence now, right ?
Meh.
Bisett had a spouse I believe. Assuming that she is still living, I’m sure she knows, or suspects, whether or not he was involved. If SCPD is serious about case, why wouldn’t they just revisit all of the POIs/suspects that had been previously cleared when the investigation was under control of Burke? And have they already done that? And if not, why haven’t they?Bisett had to be removed as a suspect because if the cops followed up on him it would lead right back to Burke. Not knowing if the trail would lead back to Burke he had to dismiss Bisset as a suspect.
that is the same thing they did for Brewer. It is as simple as that.
can you elaborate?you need to stop posting about Bitrolff on Shannan's connection to Bissett.this is not the thread to discuss Bitrolff.
If u want to know how Shannan was connected to Bissett, ask Bisett's wife Carline Bissett.
Well I know that Shannan Gilbert’s attorney John Ray has said publicly that there is proof of Bisett being a client of Shannan Gilbert.can you elaborate?
Hawkshaw, what’s your take on Gilbert’s attorney John Ray? I’ve heard him speak very candidly in one on one interviews, and he strikes me as a straight shooter, for the most part. But I’ve read quite a few posts from websleuth members question his intent, and seem to believe he is either disingenuous, or have some type of ulterior motive...and I have no idea where any of that is coming from.I heard that, too
Hawkshaw—strangely enough I just posted this yesterday in the POI: Joseph Brewer threadWell everyone has an interest in protecting themselves, their livelihood and their families (hopefully) first and foremost. And after that, possibly protecting the interests of anything or anyone that could potentially negatively impact their own interests (i.e. themselves, their livelihood, their families etc.) if they were to be adversely affected...
So if certain individual members of SCPD (active, retired, and resigned), or certain individuals who have the power and the authority to adversely impact SCPD as a collective entity (i.e. individual members and administrators as well as the collective whole), were—hypothetically—somehow implicated in some way throughout the course of the investigation as it progressed, then the investigation might just be stopped dead in its tracks by someone who has the power and authority to do so...
And that already happened...years ago (Spota and Burke).
So what’s happened since then? Who is left to protect? And who is ensuring that they are continue to be protected?