isabella88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2013
- Messages
- 1,239
- Reaction score
- 11,171
They stated who the guns belonged to?If I'm not mistaken, the items listed were seized from the home in PA and not items owned by BK.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They stated who the guns belonged to?If I'm not mistaken, the items listed were seized from the home in PA and not items owned by BK.
If that's the case he's cooked. I don't believe he would have the victim's ID stored like that though if he did take it and I don't think he had time to rummage around during the murders finding ID...Could be that he just keeps old ID's of his in a glove in a box...I guess.What if he took ID cards from the victims as souvenirs? Just a really chilling thought and it may explain why the number of cards is not included.
I am generally pretty pro law enforcement but I have to say I am not a big fan of police raids. Certainly some times they are totally necessary, but I really question that need many times. They actually create a lot of danger to suspects, officers and citizens. But I really think that law enforcement gets into a mentality that since they have SWAT teams, that they need to find reasons to use the SWAT team.I understand that's the objective, but I don't believe it's accurate to say they're making sure no innocent people are hurt. People do get hurt in these raids and those not hurt physically, are hurt psychologically. The deep psychological wounds people are left with after these raids shouldn't be ignored. BK's parents did nothing wrong as far as we know, yet they were victims of the raid and everything else aside, the raid alone has no doubt changed their lives. I get it, it had to be done and this is how it had to be done. But I go back to, I can't believe we don't have a better way. These raids are not ok, IMO.
MOO.
That crossed my mind too, unlikely as it might seem... plus it makes no sense that they would have just written "curls" IMO. Wouldn't it at least have been "hair curls/curls of hair" for clarity if it was actually human hair?What if he took ID cards from the victims as souvenirs? Just a really chilling thought and it may explain why the number of cards is not included.
From the PCA we know Xana's DL was in her room. The others aren't mentioned.What if he took ID cards from the victims as souvenirs? Just a really chilling thought and it may explain why the number of cards is not included.
I think it would have said human hair if it's "curls".That crossed my mind too, unlikely as it might seem... plus it makes no sense that they would have just written "curls" IMO. Wouldn't it at least have been "hair curls/curls of hair" for clarity if it was actually human hair?
If I'm not mistaken, the items listed were seized from the home in PA and not items owned by BK.
When I blow it up - a lot - it looks like "ID (UR61) inside glove inside box". That doesn't make any more sense to me than 10 curls, but it does have the same number of characters as what was written on the page. LOL10 curls inside glove inside box?
They stated who the guns belonged to?
I wonder if that could be the drawing they list #34 - A Man's Mind?I don't see that they did. The Glock is worrying. I wonder if this is the drawing mentioned (NSFW).
Obviously, it's not a drawing by Freud, but it is widely circulated and labeled in this manner. There are posters, t-shirts, etc. with labeled "What's on a man's mind" with this drawing.
But when a search warrant is for a whole house, everyone's stuff is searchable. Whether or not BK owned the weapons, he had access to them and it's part of the case and the narrative now.
BK is a wrecking ball. It strikes me as time to remember that the Moscow PD did everything they could to telegraph to him that they only wanted to talk to him (the owner of a certain white Elantra) and he had to have known they meant him (despite his Elantra being a different year). Why didn't he just go in and speak with LE back in Idaho?
Answer: mens rea, a guilty mind.
IMO. He could have saved his family from this part of it. I too would like to know who actually owned the gun.
I am generally pretty pro law enforcement but I have to say I am not a big fan of police raids. Certainly some times they are totally necessary, but I really question that need many times. They actually create a lot of danger to suspects, officers and citizens. But I really think that law enforcement gets into a mentality that since they have SWAT teams, that they need to find reasons to use the SWAT team.
I get what you are saying, and although the objective is to keep innocent people safe, I agree that doesn't always happen. Unfortunately, there are a limited number of ways to extract one dangerous person from a group without creating a scenario where that dangerous person has time to commit more harm in any number of ways. A lot of people make their living figuring out the least terrible way to do that. So far, a raid is the least terrible option those people have managed to come up with. Is there a better way? Possibly, but I've never heard an option suggested that couldn't end up just as badly.I understand that's the objective, but I don't believe it's accurate to say they're making sure no innocent people are hurt. People do get hurt in these raids and those not hurt physically, are hurt psychologically. The deep psychological wounds people are left with after these raids shouldn't be ignored. BK's parents did nothing wrong as far as we know, yet they were victims of the raid and everything else aside, the raid alone has no doubt changed their lives. I get it, it had to be done and this is how it had to be done. But I go back to, I can't believe we don't have a better way. These raids are not ok, IMO.
MOO.
I get what you are saying, and although the objective is to keep innocent people safe, I agree that doesn't always happen. Unfortunately, there are a limited number of ways to extract one dangerous person from a group without creating a scenario where that dangerous person has time to commit more harm in any number of ways. A lot of people make their living figuring out the least terrible way to do that. So far, a raid is the least terrible option those people have managed to come up with. Is there a better way? Possibly, but I've never heard an option suggested that couldn't end up just as badly.
That was my thinking as well.But when a search warrant is for a whole house, everyone's stuff is searchable. Whether or not BK owned the weapons, he had access to them and it's part of the case and the narrative now.
Agreed. I feel for them so much.IMO. He could have saved his family from this part of it.
I haven't seen any "pro-Khoberger" groupies, but I have seen some individuals convinced the police got the wrong guy. I wonder if that's what they mean.
If so, I don't think that's a reason to ban anyone, but private forums can have their own rules, obviously. I wish the wheels of justice would move more quickly, but I understand why it's essential to give both sides ample time to prove their cases.
I am so upset that I missed the print! I did not know about this. It must have been there and gone in a flash. In any event, I am glad someone like you DID see it, as I trust your judgement. I also agree with everything in your last paragraph...IMOAt one point, a publication published (then took down - probably via court order) a alleged copy of the latent print. Or so they said, so take with a grain of salt. It was alleged to be the Van's footprint (it was in two major MSM outlets, but again, no link because not available). Still, I think it's likely the print (this was before the gag order) and if definitely showed wear patterns. So, IMO and without any link to show the print, I will say that IF that was the print they certainly do have good evidence about several aspects about the murderer's left foot.
Enough to show whether BK could have worn the shoe - for example, length of each toe seems visible. Height of arch etc. At any rate, such a footprint would definitely help identify the killer.
IMO.
Personally, I do not think he was wearing the flashlight or the gloves when they came into his room to arrest him. It's possible he wasn't asleep, of course, and it's possible he was getting ready to roam around in a place where he needed that flashlight, but it's unlikely. The clothes are probably what he dressed in when they told him to get dressed and they found nothing else of a physical nature in his room.
IMO.
I don't know, but my clothing has mostly been black since I was a teenager. While black is a practical choice for home invaders and cat burglars, it can also be just as simple as liking black. I like that if I spill food on it, it isn't ruined forever. Also, it goes with everything.That's an awful lot of black or dark clothing - though I don't know what would be considered normal these days for a young man.