Even CM and his lawyer can't get their stories together.
CM - I don't know them, never seen them
Lawyer - yes CM knew them and the DNA can be explained easily
Makes it very difficult to think he's "just a patsy"
The man is innocent and it is a disgrace as an honest American he is accused of crimes based on a process Paul Holes adopted because he wanted to solve the Golden State Killer case and he got that one wrong in my opinion.
Considering Moore is the chief genetic genealogist with Parabon NanoLab, I highly highly doubt she had anything to do with the identification process. Look at all jobs, the higher you go the less grunt work you have to do. And yes to us this is high profile murders but to the rest of the country it's just murders of two girls in a small South Alabama city. If it was a Bundy, I-5 killer, BTK, Dalmer even OJ type case then yeah I could see her more involved but with this not so much.
How do you know he is 100% innocent? Are you privy to evidence that hasn't been made public?
I know the Golden State Killer is Ralph Jackson so I am assuming if this case was based on aspiration from this case they also have the wrong suspect.
While I respect your opinion that CM is innocent(according to the law he is innocent as of now), I don't think you understand how this genealogy testing works. They aren't matching anything to the crime scene. They are looking for a potential suspect. They then get that suspects actual DNA and match it to the crime scene.
If Ralph Jackson is the GSK why didn't his DNA match anything ever found at the crime scenes?
His DNA has been found at crime scenes you will have to ask the FBi that questionm
.
His DNA has been found at crime scenes you will have to ask the FBi that questionm
.
56 times?? I saw where he was arrested a couple of times and never saw where he was disbarred..Where did you see this?? I have wondered this whole time how he still has a license to practice law!!!
Shark is talking about two different people. But yes, the lawyer was disbarred and reinstated. That is a rare event. I am surprised. But it is irrelevant to me. He is not the person on trial
The 56 times refers to the purported community activist. I have not looked into him. Never heard of him before. Just keeping my nose to the facts and the analysis of possibilities regarding the case.
Quo Vadis[/QUOTE
I agree! The only thing interesting to me in the video was the court date. The activist (or whatever he is) really said a lot to end up saying nothing at all in my book.
Exactly!The evidence (as far of as the semen and DNA) wasn't kept in ozark it stayed at the state lab where it was found to preserve the chain and evidence itself.
As far a the forensic file... I believe they left parts out, just like the semen in the vaginal swab, to preserve the case. We already know and it's been proven that the LE agencies have prevented the public access to a lot of the evidence found. Not only that but some rape victims don't always have trauma that show significant signs rape, some fight back others go with it to get it over with to try and survive it's one of those you have know idea what you are going to do until you are in that situation. For all we know (if the trauma evidence wasn't one of the things that was held out of public view) he could have locked Traci alive in the trunk in the beginning to leverage control over JB, the do what I want or I'll kill your friend and then you. JB could have realized that no matter what the rape was going to happen do the next thing you would try to to is just survive the night, together JB and Traci
I know the Golden State Killer is Ralph Jackson so I am assuming if this case was based on aspiration from this case they also have the wrong suspect.
56 times?? I saw where he was arrested a couple of times and never saw where he was disbarred..Where did you see this?? I have wondered this whole time how he still has a license to practice law!!!
56 times?? I saw where he was arrested a couple of times and never saw where he was disbarred..Where did you see this?? I have wondered this whole time how he still has a license to practice law!!!
There is no forensics test that can determine if a victim was raped.
The evidence (as far of as the semen and DNA) wasn't kept in ozark it stayed at the state lab where it was found to preserve the chain and evidence itself.
As far a the forensic file... I believe they left parts out, just like the semen in the vaginal swab, to preserve the case. We already know and it's been proven that the LE agencies have prevented the public access to a lot of the evidence found. Not only that but some rape victims don't always have trauma that show significant signs rape, some fight back others go with it to get it over with to try and survive it's one of those you have know idea what you are going to do until you are in that situation. For all we know (if the trauma evidence wasn't one of the things that was held out of public view) he could have locked Traci alive in the trunk in the beginning to leverage control over JB, the do what I want or I'll kill your friend and then you. JB could have realized that no matter what the rape was going to happen do the next thing you would try to to is just survive the night, together JB and Traci