papertrail
Former Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2015
- Messages
- 2,573
- Reaction score
- 2,616
Hi guys, I'm new as a member of websleuths community but have been actively reading the CSK forums for the last few years both here and else where.
Just some points I would like to clarify that I see mentioned quite a lot.
1)Just because a suspect has been ruled out means absolutely nothing, Ted Bundy, Gary Ridgeway, The Yorkshire ripper & Paul Bernado (Ken & Barbie killers) just to name a few were all ruled out in the investigations of their crimes, only to be nabbed years later.
2) There is a clear progression pattern with serial killers, from stalking, to rape, to killing. Just because one may kill but not sexually assault a victim has no representation on the crimes he/she committed in the early stages of their progression, a rapist might go on to murder without sexual assault, this is because the murder/inflicting fear itself is where the killer gains the sexual arousal.
3) Assuming the victims were familiar with the killer is a reasonable assumption but not rock solid, Ted Bundy was able to lure intelligent young woman into his vehicle with nothing more than an arm cast and pure charm. Another case I read, unsure right now of the name simply pulled up beside his victims, flashed a knife and told them to get into his car which 6 of 7 woman did.
LW still remains my strongest suspect of all the known suspects there is however there is one point that leads me to believe it wasn't him. There is absolutely no way he would just stop, even if he knew he was under surveillance. To kill in this fashion is more than a simple wanting to do so, it is a compulsion, I could see him going 5 or 10 years without a kill, but 20 is getting beyond reasonable, even less so without trophies which is something most serial killers use to relive the fantasy during the cooling down periods. (I assume after so many police searches that if it was him some trophies would have been found).
Now with that said I have a question for the community...
Has anyone looked into similar murders across Australia or New Zealand in the time frame after these murders took place? I highly doubt that killer simply stopped, aside from being in jail or dead it is almost a guarantee that he would continue to kill, the time frames between murders might change, the methods of murder might change and the locations might change, but not the compulsion to kill.
EDITED*
Second question, At the time of the murders were there any Holden Manufacturers or Holden accessory manufacturers in and around the Perth area? I tried a google search but couldn't find much so hoping a local could shed light on that.
A couple of things re LW. He received comprehensive and ongoing psychological treatment including intensive drug therapy; hence he may not have had the opportunity. He did regress back home to mother's apron strings so I consider she has a great influence upon him. I wonder what will occur when she passes; his father passed in 2007. He could hide victim trophies anywhere. Newspaper articles, publicity, blogging sites and forums are all modern day trophies. He visits his local library so does he do this so he can readup on current issues.