MsAnais
Verified Clinical Psychologist (AU)
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2013
- Messages
- 3,081
- Reaction score
- 30
I was just thinking if the ATM was really used could it possibly have been used as an attempt to establish an alibi for somebody? ie. if the investigators when tracing Kylie's steps that day were led to believe that Kylie successfully withdrew cash at 12.30 in Packenham then that would have meant that her attack wasn't until later in the day potential creating an alibi for the attacker. If the cash withdrawal had've been successful this would have possibly led the investigators to believe that she was still alive at 12.30. I hope this makes sense. The person attempting withdrawal must have thought they knew the pin number and either their recollection was wrong or they were so stressed they mucked it up. Nobody would be stupid enough to think they had a chance of guessing a pin. Robbery still doesn't sit right, remember early on the police said their were items of value in the house that weren't taken.
As ever, you make some good points IMO :seeya:
No one would try to guess a pin....and what kind of person would hang around for TWO hours after murdering someone, trying their card??!
Whoever was trying the PIN thought they knew it. The only other thing I can think is that Kylie gave them an incorrect PIN number under duress :facepalm:. But even then, what kind of fool would go to the local ATM after killing someone???! Makes no sense.
But the attempted establishment of an alibi does make sense.
I hope we find out the truth. And soon!!!