Unfortunately, I don’t know. I don’t live in the area. I just have a bit of knowledge of Bakersfield and the area around the 58 because it’s the mid-way child exchange point for my ex-husband and I.
I pray to God she is smart enough to start talking to the DA with a representative. She needs to end this farce. Step up girl.
This is nothing but bluffing as long as they don't have more info than we do (they do in general) that points towards abduction.
when the chief says "foul play" and that "someone picked them up" I think he specifically leaves room for interpretation (of outsiders being involved) but in reality believes the parents are behind it, as we have watched exactly where (or who) LE has been investigating. MOOSo the dogs hit on what is reported to be the scent of these two boys, inside the house, but don't hit on the scent outside the house? I wonder what items were used to get the original scent for the canines.
TW says for certain the boys were outside. Doesn't add up. Scent found inside, no scent found outside, TW says boys were outside. How can that be?
Neighbors report never seeing the boys. Never? As in, never, ever saw them? Since September? That right there I find amazing. I think I also read NONE of the 6 children reported to be living in the home were ever seen by neighbors?
Then there's that reported last time they were seen was by Grandma.
I dunno. I'm gonna go out on a limb and say, and it's my opinion only, but I'm going to postulate that those boys were never in that home. And, IF they were in that home at some time prior, they were out of there long before the evening they were reported missing. Long enough for any scent to dissipate, assuming the scent given the canines was indeed the scent of those two boys.
So I look to Bakersfield for answers. And if/when that dead ends, then.....
I speculate these two boys may have been missing for much longer, possibly days, weeks, or even months. But why? Why would the adopted parents bring the entire thing to light by making that 911 call? I mean, if they were involved in some nefarious activity, and nobody has said a word, and nothing has been reported, then why would they make it a national issue all of sudden?
Or, maybe those boys were squirreled out of that house under cover, but unbeknownst to the other 4 children living there?
And why, or what, would lead LE to conclude foul play? Does LE think the dogs were wrong, that they just had bad sniffers that day, and the story is true, and those boys went out that gate, and were kidnapped by someone who just happened to be driving by, and said, HEY, maybe I'll take those kids right there?
Nah, MOO, I think something very bad has happened to these boys, and the entire convoluted story is fabricated to cover it up.
Go easy on me, I've just read up on this thing, and haven't read the entire 4 threads thus far
For non West Coasters that's about an hour and a half from now.
This was myUgh exactly. Whaaaaat?
And then this little gem:
(Bayan’s reference to bio mom and then question about foul play)
TW:
“That’s understandable. I would think the same thing.
I mean- That’s exactly the point. And if we can find our, find our babies, then guess what? That’s, that’s no.”
Are you freaking kidding? Wth kind of response is that?
i ageee they seem to subconsciously tell on themselves. Like “that’s the point “ if we find them, “that’s no” because we wont. This interview . I could convict them with so many assumptions. But that’s just my assumptions . I wish they’d get it all out already they would feel better ! Oof
I would have been banging down every neighbor door and screaming their names and begging for help but that’s the thing we want to remove from a case Becuase not everyone acts the same .. however we have seen in the past . The innocent don’t act like these two did.
I don't think so. As TW Specifically stated the two littles stay with them because they watch them. Not the GP, not aunts or uncles,or anyone else. Just him and JW. MOO
So the dogs hit on what is reported to be the scent of these two boys, inside the house, but don't hit on the scent outside the house? I wonder what items were used to get the original scent for the canines.
TW says for certain the boys were outside. Doesn't add up. Scent found inside, no scent found outside, TW says boys were outside. How can that be?
Neighbors report never seeing the boys. Never? As in, never, ever saw them? Since September? That right there I find amazing. I think I also read NONE of the 6 children reported to be living in the home were ever seen by neighbors?
Then there's that reported last time they were seen was by Grandma.
I dunno. I'm gonna go out on a limb and say, and it's my opinion only, but I'm going to postulate that those boys were never in that home. And, IF they were in that home at some time prior, they were out of there long before the evening they were reported missing. Long enough for any scent to dissipate, assuming the scent given the canines was indeed the scent of those two boys.
So I look to Bakersfield for answers. And if/when that dead ends, then.....
I speculate these two boys may have been missing for much longer, possibly days, weeks, or even months. But why? Why would the adopted parents bring the entire thing to light by making that 911 call? I mean, if they were involved in some nefarious activity, and nobody has said a word, and nothing has been reported, then why would they make it a national issue all of sudden?
Or, maybe those boys were squirreled out of that house under cover, but unbeknownst to the other 4 children living there?
And why, or what, would lead LE to conclude foul play? Does LE think the dogs were wrong, that they just had bad sniffers that day, and the story is true, and those boys went out that gate, and were kidnapped by someone who just happened to be driving by, and said, HEY, maybe I'll take those kids right there?
Nah, MOO, I think something very bad has happened to these boys, and the entire convoluted story is fabricated to cover it up.
Go easy on me, I've just read up on this thing, and haven't read the entire 4 threads thus far
