CTV News 6pm. Last video of Nathan is included
http://calgary.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=397101&binId=1.1201914&playlistPageNum=1
http://calgary.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=397101&binId=1.1201914&playlistPageNum=1
To be clear, LE is NOT going to divulge what evidence they actually have and in my opinion they do have some evidence. They would not be spending the time and effort tearing apart DG's acreage if they didn't have SOMETHING. It may not be enough to charge anyone with but it's a start. IMHO LE needs to be absolutely sure that they have crossed all the t's and dotted all the i's before they move in for the "kill".
LE released the CCTV shot of the truck for help. Let's not forget that they probably have more footage of the truck and who's to say they don't see that truck parked right in the driveway. They might have seen several things that we have not been made privy to and we won't be made privy to. There have been many a case where you hear absolutely nothing and everything LE is doing makes no sense and then boom! it all comes together.
<snip>
LE knows stuff and they know stuff about their POI. It will all come together but it's going to take some time.
I don't believe LE has ever stated that blood was found in the home. Correct me if I'm mistaken but I really don't think the presence of blood on the scene has ever been mentioned specifically by LE?
What is that blue "pond" (and the blueish area nearby)? Very unnatural. Is it some kind of chemical storage of Garland or what? (sorry if this sounds ignorant)
CTV News 6pm. Last video of Nathan is included
http://calgary.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=397101&binId=1.1201914&playlistPageNum=1
http://globalnews.ca/news/1433136/police-confirm-violent-incident-occurred-inside-missing-familys-home/
"Normally it takes several months for analysis, but officers have expedited the examination and hope to have the results within several days or a week. Despite the grisly evidence found at the scene, police remain optimistic."
OK I should have said AT the home.
I don't believe LE has ever stated that blood was found in the home. Correct me if I'm mistaken but I really don't think the presence of blood on the scene has ever been mentioned specifically by LE?
Thank you for the link. I still don't see any mention of blood specifically. I think they have carefully avoided using the word.
CP24 in Toronto is saying on their live tv news that bail today was set at $750,000. All articles I read say $750 bail. (as well CP24 website says $750) Which is correct ? I have heard it twice now on the Tv when they are updating daily news stories.
We continue because none of us wants to hear of a negative outcome. I would prefer to believe that a sweet little boy was not in the wrong place at the wrong time. I think that we would prefer to believe they are some where and we can help find them unharmed. I most certainly want to believe that no one would hurt a child. Yep, I live in a utopia, however theories allow us to have hope. It has been 12 days, I'm still going with a hope theory that perhaps they all went away with DGs assistance to get away from their financial issues, after all...DG was an expert at creating a new identity. Who else do you know of that created a new identity and got away with it for 7 years?And ... even when LE tells us details about what evidence they have, we continue as though we don't believe it. How many theories have been expounded that ignore the evidence that the three did not leave the house voluntarily.
Great post. WelcomeNewbie posting for the first time. Hello!
I've been lurking and reading for quite some time and I think that sometimes we are assuming things that just may not be....
To be clear, LE is NOT going to divulge what evidence they actually have and in my opinion they do have some evidence. They would not be spending the time and effort tearing apart DG's acreage if they didn't have SOMETHING. It may not be enough to charge anyone with but it's a start. IMHO LE needs to be absolutely sure that they have crossed all the t's and dotted all the i's before they move in for the "kill".
LE released the CCTV shot of the truck for help. Let's not forget that they probably have more footage of the truck and who's to say they don't see that truck parked right in the driveway. They might have seen several things that we have not been made privy to and we won't be made privy to. There have been many a case where you hear absolutely nothing and everything LE is doing makes no sense and then boom! it all comes together.
I believe that the truck in the video is the truck at the farm. If it wasn't...they would still be looking for a truck and THAT we would know about. I believe they have the truck they seek.
This appears extremely complicated and when there are tons of players, companies, bankruptcies, family members, grudges, drug dealers, etc., everything becomes convoluted and it becomes a huge puzzle that is going to take time to decipher.
The problem is that 3 people are missing and time is moving on and it makes everything so much more urgent.
LE knows stuff and they know stuff about their POI. It will all come together but it's going to take some time.
Excellent! Thank you. Yes one immediately assumes the presence of blood and I have no doubt there was blood. LE, however, have been extremely careful about what they specify and I don't believe they have ever said "blood" just "evidence". Of course certain reporters add words like "grisly" ....... Which, of course leads us to picture a bloody crime scene. LE would be doing these poor people a disservice if they were too specific."We can now confirm that a violent crime happened in that residence," said Calgary police Staff Sgt. Doug Andrus.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgar...home-1.2696527
BBM/UBM
Technically, you are correct. I guess I just assumed since 4 days after they sent in forensics, this article comes out. And they describe that someone could be in medical distress.
Cherchri -Now that I re-read earlier articles, they did not come out and say a violent crime took place until 7/4. I have been so skeptical about whether there was blood at the scene. I go back and forth. You are correct...LE says "No comment" to the questions as to whether there was blood at the scene. However, they never mention that they suspected a VIOLENT CRIME took place until 4 days after the forensics team had gathered evidence. The 3 went missing on 6/30. Then 4 days later, LE said they believed a violent crime took place in the residence and someone would be in medical distress.I have a pretty sneaking suspicion that they got confirmation on those forensics as BLOOD to indicate a violent crime /medical distress. One could assume that the forensics from the drag marks and within the home were confirmed as blood and those results took 4 days to come back. What evidence on the scene would point to a violent crime resulting in someone being in medical distress when you don't have bodies to examine? To me...it's blood.
I am beginning to talk myself into believing that there was blood at the scene. That is just my opinion, assumption, etc.
I think it's someone's idea of increasing the vibrance. It should be the reflection of the sky on the water.
Thank you for the link. I still don't see any mention of blood specifically. I think they have carefully avoided using the word.
Also, maybe the perp decided to dispose of the bodies (as opposed to leaving them there) to hide DNA evidence.
Just suppose KL fought back...she'd have the perps DNA under her fingernails.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk