I really dislike this question but it seems really fitting right now, do you have a link for any of these things you're writing about KC and Cindy; or is this whole post just your own thoughts and opinions?
KC began working at Universal late 2004, she was already pregnant when she started working and continued through her pregnancy, (I'm assuming she took some maternity leave). Caylee was born in August, at some point KC went back and stayed at Universal until after the 1st of January 2006. For whatever reason when Universal and Kodak ended their partnership KC decided this was a good time to pull out too, she quite by never completing her new paper work. In other words she worked for about 15 months give or take.
This time line was created by testimony under oath by CA stating KC had her own insurance from Universal when Caylee was born and LE pulling KC's earning statements showing no earned income after 1st q 2006. KC's former supervisor stated KC just failed to show, she wasn't fired nor did she 'quit'.
You believe KC didn't work because she wanted to spend all her time with Caylee? Yet her former very good friend who babysat when Caylee was an infant (for free no less) quit when she became convinced KC wasn't working, and she felt taken advantage of because KC was out, having fun with her friends while her BFF was babysitting for free. Then Jesse and his family took over from 7 mos til passed KC 1st Bday (I believe JG said in LE interview he and his family babysat for a year but not positive) regardless the whole time they babysat KC NEVER HAD A JOB, she left Universal before March 06!! You can find all this in the docs, from LE interviews.
Did you know that it is fairly consistently believed that when the sex drive of mothers with young children is lower than their counterparts without children it is because they spend so much time with their children touching them, hugging them, holding them that sex just feels like an extension of all that physical attention they are already getting. Not tonite, dear is really nothing more than a request to be left alone. Take the kids away for a couple days, give the mom some time to herself, for a few hours, and the ol' sex drive pops right back up there. We know KC wasn't struggling with this, don't we!
KC telling LE she could have given Caylee to her mom, in other words I didn't have to kill her, will come back to haunt her at trial. This was not a statement made to prove she wanted to keep Caylee, it was KC grasping for straws as her poorly thought out excuse or reasoning to make make LE think she had no reason to want her dead. It didn't work then and evidence will prove LE was right to toss her in jail.
While I would never dream of pretending to know more than a doctor of education (I'm assuming) who has written a book that Montesorri teachers follow. The practice of empowering a child to feel in control by suggesting he holds the power of death over his teachers or parents sounds like a very risky and scary game. What happened to using our words? and time outs? Seriously, what happens when this kid is 10 or 12 and mommy and daddy are still bullying him, he grabs a knife from the kitchen and kicks the game up a notch. Or he's 14 and his PE coach is "picking on him" so he brings a gun to school. I agree 110% that kids need to have some say in their life but a 5 or 6 year old should not have an adult playing picture teacher, mommy and/or daddy dead. That is frightening.
I haven't seen anything that would make me willing to believe any of this. Hey
if it's your opinion that's great, we're all entitled to our own opinions but they should be stated as such.
]I believe you are right, KC had other options, their are always other options, besides hurting/killing a 2 y o baby!
I don't think anyone has paid any attention though to it.
