Jethro4WS
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2016
- Messages
- 6,053
- Reaction score
- 35,220
We don't know any of that to be true. If I were interested in people's guesses and what they think is common sense then it wouldn't be an issue. For me common sense dictates that I would not want to be in the vicinity of the person I thought was responsible for my daughter missing. For one, the risk is extremely high that I would kill him in the process of getting every answer I needed. But that is just me and my perspective.I think there are some common sense assumptions very safe to make and that is why the media pressed the question.
The child's maternal grandmother had every right to see her biological grandchild especially because the child's mother was missing. CB didn't need to be in PF's presence. He could have arranged for a meeting at his attorney's office. Instead, PF chose to project himself as arrogant and selfishly unconcerned about the child's best interest.
Duly noted and the media and the public don't quickly forget. JMO