GBC Trial General Discussion Thread #3

Status
Not open for further replies.
As stated before Max Sica - look him up - was convicted on FAR LESS circumstantial evidence....

Thanks for the heads up. I've heard the name but missed the case. Those poor parents. :(

Doubly thank you for settling my nerves a bit. The tone of the last thread was making me nervous.

I find it kinda creepy how similar GBC is to so many other men accused/convicted of murdering their significant other, globally. They seem to be a breed amongst themselves.


Please pardon errors as posted via Tapatalk with a less than stellar user.
 
Sorry if this has already been asked or mentioned/answered....I'm playing catch up again.

Alioop: When do you expect the trial to finish??

I'm trying to swap my night shifts for this Sun, Mon & Tues ( so far successfully got rid of sun & mon night!!! Yay......working on Tues night :blushing: )

I Will owe a few work mates some favors after this is over ( yes they all think I'm obsessed when I had to explain why I wanted to swap the shifts :blushing: )

Well I am the wrong person to ask because I thought it would be all over this week but I was so wrong about GBC giving evidence! So it seems there is his evidence to finish which could take a few days including cross examination, then they have other witnesses as well so it will go Monday to Thursday next week at least. Probably into the following week too.

Apologies in advance as I'm often a day or two behind you all...I'm still trying to catch up on the last thread (before GBC took the stand) but have a question...

Are there a high degree of acquittals in Oz? I keep reading how concerned people are of such an outcome so I'm curious. I really believe the Crown has presented a decent circumstantial argument, and can list a dozen convictions based on less - even a few no body cases - but those are mostly American. So perhaps I'm just overly optimistic.

Please pardon errors as posted via Tapatalk with a less than stellar user.

Hi BritsKate , have seen your excellent posts on Oscar Pistorius forum. People are concerned but there are a lot of posters in this forum who have only followed this case. I think the prosecution have a strong circumstantial case and with the accused on the stand now anything can happen. We know the debacle that happened to OP in giving evidence. Gerrie made mincemeat of him in cross examination and their own witness got him sectioned for a psyc evaluation. I can't wait until his trial starts again!
 
Forgive me,which part has you worried?

If its serotonin toxicity and the defence uses that... they'd be shooting themselves in the foot. Doesn't give any thought to the fact there was blood and her hair in the car, plants from their property found entwined in her hair,no evidence of broken bones from falling off a bridge, no evidence of any overdose, no evidence of suicidal ideation etc.

I think the forensic toxicologist's testimony may very well be interesting on Monday, or whenever he takes the stand but I would have one question for him.

"Was Allison Baden-Clay ever your patient or have you ever had cause to treat her?"

I'm expecting the answer would be "No."

So IMO he can waffle on all he likes with his expert opinion about Serotonin Syndrome. It will not counter the forensic evidence found at autopsy and also that of the doctors and specialist's that treated Allison for her depression.
 
Hello all! First-time poster here, though I’ve been following this story as I’ve waited for my username and email address to be verified… and I’m in, yay! I’ve read everyone’s comments and found them all very fascinating – it’s so amazing and fortunate to have a community like this to help analyse the case, and cases like this. I also find it very interesting that many people have brought up intelligent questions and points that seemingly have been overlooked in court (or are not allowed to be discussed in court for some reason or another…. Grrr.). I’m a Brisbanite born and raised and I have to say, in my 37-year lifetime I’ve never come across a local trial like this. When GBC took the stand yesterday, the entire city stood still.

Before I get into my thoughts, I have a few questions to ask. (Sorry if they’ve been asked already and I missed them during my speed-reading…)

*Urgh, why doesn’t our criminal system allow polygraphs? GBC would be sweating buckets.

*Anyone have a clear idea where GBC is going with TMCH? My first thought was he was going to throw her under the bus. The statement Byrne made – “Allison asked about whether Toni felt bad because he was married, he said she did” – doesn’t seem to make sense because it seems evident that the only thing on her mind was Gerard, Gerard, Gerard. Why would GBC introduce this idea? I can’t think of it as being any use to the defence team?

*One thing keeps playing over in my mind and I don’t quite grasp what it means – in Allison’s diary, she quotes GBC as saying he couldn’t go back to Toni even if he wanted to. Did he insinuate to Allison perhaps that TMCH wouldn’t take him back? Or was he talking about their financial situation or the kids? If it were the latter, I’d think she’d mention the kids in her diary. “Says he is staying with me for kids. Doesn’t love me?” – or something similar? Maybe not – who knows what a person’s really thinking – but I wonder what he meant by telling her this.

*Can someone remind me of the exact day in which the verdict is to be read out?

Thoughts re: GBC’s latest comments…

*Allison’s depression/panic attacks: In reference to the comment that Allison was so panicked that she would “pass out” behind the wheel – in my history of psychological research (I have a degree in psych but also a personal interest in the subject, as well as two family members who suffer from panic attacks – one suffers them while driving), NOTHING suggests that a panic attack would lead to the person to “pass out”. In fact, it’s more likely the opposite: the person suffering a panic attacks has their heart hammering, is feeling extreme heat going all up and down their body, can’t breathe properly and is convinced they will die. They are so consciously fearful and panic attacks are so awful that the hyperactive body is not able to simply “pass out”. In my research and from anecdotal research, NO ONE suffering from a panic attack is at risk of passing out. They will instead suffer through it with a heartbeat so accelerated that at times even others can see the hammering movement of their heart through their chest.

*“Byrne says Allison desperately wanted a son because there were no male Baden-Clays”: OK, this isn’t Game of Thrones. We don’t all seek out male heirs to continue the family line. In fact, NO ONE here does. It’s a modern society here like everywhere else. The Baden-Clays and their snobbery about their name are the exception in Brisbane. To everyone else, banging on and on about the family name is a joke. People are free to marry who they like, to take their partner’s surname only if they wish to, etc etc. The days of men longing for a male heir are LONG past. It is also laughable to suggest that a lack of male heir would make a man want to have an affair?!?! (Who does GBC think he is, Henry VIII?)

*Zoloft: I am on Zoloft for anxiety (which has helped very nicely! I’m now much more able to operate, work, go out into society etc much more than I ever did in my 20s, when I wasn’t on Zoloft.) Zoloft is considered to be so safe that even GPs have the authority to prescribe it. “Gerard said they were told a possible side effect from Zoloft was causing more anxiety, loss of libido.” Though Zoloft has a possible side effect of loss of libido, this is higher in men than in women. (And I myself found no such side effect from Zoloft usage: I am female.) As to Gerard being told that a possible side effect of Zoloft is anxiety (a condition that Zoloft is specifically used to control), a study reported by Melissa Conrad Stoppler, MD found that out of 2,799 test subjects taking Zoloft, only 4 people reported anxiety. (The control group that took a placebo showed that 3 people reported anxiety).
So, this study showed that amongst Zoloft users, 0.14% of patients reported anxiety while using Zoloft. In another study, NHS UK reported that 1 in 100 people who take Sertraline hypochloride “may feel nervous or anxious”.
So, at best, Gerard is suggesting that Allison is part of 0.14%-1% of people who suffer from the very rare side effect of anxiety subsisting from Zoloft usage. Yeah, right.

*“Toni became more demanding, telling him he should leave Allison to be with her. That continued for about three years.” – Who in their right mind will believe this? I believe that TMCH didn’t give a fig about Allison, yes, but what man runs out and has a secret affair – potentially costing him everything – when their mistress is “demanding… for about three years.” What we know of GBC and what I’ve seen of men who have affairs is that they choose women who are NOT problematic – they rush off and have the affair because it’s easy for them, not hard! The mistress is their escapism, not an extra burden they’ve taken on! Sheesh… if she was so “demanding” then why did he keep it going for so long? He can’t say it was fear over Allison finding out. She already found out and he continued the affair! Is he insinuating that he’s so soft and stupid that TMCH had him under the thumb? From all the evidence we’ve heard so far, this is far from the truth. As someone else pointed out earlier, it was a poverty-driven affair: no throwing around of money or spa getaways – it was meet-ups in the back of the car, etc. TMCH basically followed him around and did whatever he wanted. It seemed like Toni was easy for him to manage for the most part (else why continue the affair?) and that he loved how needy she was – she blindly adored him, even though he was married, and until their last conversation seemingly let him do whatever he wanted.
What’s his defence against his physical relationship with TMCH? He tripped, fell, and landed on her in a compromising position – over and over again for 3-4 years? What an unlucky, clumsy fellow he is!

*"To be perfectly candid with you it came to a point where I was doing 80 to 90 to 95 ... I couldn't breastfeed obviously [but] I was doing everything in the home because Allison was in a depressed state that wouldn't really enable her to do anything": OK, even if we’re going to buy these lies of his… Has anyone ever explained to GBC what looking after your child is called? It’s called “fatherhood”. Are we supposed to feel sympathy for him because he helped take care of his child? Did he think Allison would just pump out the babies and take care of everything while he sat in a hammock out the back sipping on Long Island Iced Teas and mentally reliving the glory of Kieran Perkins’ swimming career? Because marriage is supposed to be an equal partnership – i.e. you take care of your kids! Even if he’s telling the truth, he’s still doing less than single fathers have to do.

*“When she was pregnant for the second time she was flat": Really? I don’t have kids but have a lot of younger siblings I helped raise. I remember my mother struggling more or less alone during each pregnancy and birth. And wow, it was totally a breeze! It was all I could do to stop my mother from doing cartwheels! (Sorry about all the sarcasm, but really…?!)

*“She was really feeling incapable of much at all. She spoke to my mum about it. She didn't want to speak to her parents about it”: How convenient that she allegedly told no one but GBC’s family about it. This explanation means no one can contradict GBC except for family members who are already on his side – and they’ve had their time in court already.

*“I can tell you 100 per cent why I didn't tell anybody, I was protecting my beautiful wife”: if he doesn’t stop referencing his “beautiful wife”, I’m going to rush down to the courtroom myself and… God only knows what. We know she was beautiful, yes, but does GBC believe this? Evidently not (infidelity). What man, by the way, constantly refers to his wife as “my beautiful wife” in public? Normal men just say “my wife” when referring to their partner, in the same way women don’t refer to their husbands as “my breathtakingly awesome husband.” I looked at his blog and it made me sick – he’s saying he likes Brigitte Jones’s diary because he likes watching chick flicks with “his beautiful wife”. Wow, he’s got that “beautiful wife” line down pat. What man on their blog or facebook or social media page – no matter how in love with their wife – state that they like a movie because they can watch it with “their beautiful wife”? The fact is, men don’t in normal conversation. Because people aren’t interested in hearing this and your blog/fb profile/social media page is about YOUR likes and interests. I can’t think of one occasion where a husband has publicly said “my beautiful wife” so many times in a row, unless you’re Kanye West or someone equally stupid. And I admit GBC is stupid, but the more someone reiterates the same unusual statement over and over the more I question their truthfulness. While some men may believe their wives are beautiful and love them dearly, they don’t harp on about it in public – people get sick of hearing it; it’s not relevant to the listener.

*Princess Diana/Kieran Perkins/9/11 references: What is this, A Brief History Of Modern Global Events by Gerald Baden Clay? Is he going to bring up Michael Jackson’s death too? How “Hurt Locker” won the Academy Award? The global financial crisis and its implications for iron ore exports out of Australia? Obama’s re-election? GBC, we’re all well aware of these events. If any of us want to check out the hit list of what’s happened over the last decade or so, we’ll look up Wikipedia. Not Badenopedia.

*“Allison was a very gifted ballerina as a child and was under considerable pressure, she felt”: Guess what, so was I. And ballet teachers can be quite nasty and induce nerves. That doesn’t mean that as an adult I’m suffering traumatic flashbacks to the time my teacher screamed at me in front of everyone, stating “I’m starting to regret moving you up to the senior class. Go and stand in the corner for 45 minutes and stare at the wall. No, closer than that! Nose to the wall! Now stay there”. It was bad, yes, but it happened was when I was a child, in a different world where this behaviour was overlooked. Things that happen in your childhood can shape you as a person but something like this does not have an impact on your daily life as an adult, in my experience. Nor is there any research out there to correlating pressure received as a child from ballet teachers with raising your children as an adult!

*“Byrne back up. Saying Gerard had no intention of being with Toni. Told her 1 July but knew it wouldn't happen.” Hey, this happens to be one part of the defence argument that may be true. I think his skill was in placating women. I think he murdered Allison for the money alone (and maybe the free-swinging single lifestyle). I’m not a mathematician, but he was about $1 million in debt. Allison’s life insurance was around $1 million. What an odd coincidence!!! I always felt he only kept TMCH stringing along, just placating her and taking whatever pleasure he could from her. And now he seems to be throwing her under the bus, this just confirms my suspicion.

*Traded down from Lexus to Captiva: Oh, wow, what a come-down! How could he live with this economic desolation? Having to downgrade a car to accommodate a changed financial situation – what a tragedy. I’m sure the starving, poverty-stricken refugees in Africa are feeling sympathy for GBC’s monetary issues. (Sorry, but his woe-is-me story just drives me insane...)

*Are we really going to have to endure The Dull History of GBC’s Travels & Work History for days to come? I’m trying to think of what witnesses the defence could possibly call. Forensic guys who might try to discredit the prosecution’s forensic experts’ arguments, yes, but the defence has already covered this in response to the prosecution witnesses. (Through stupid arguments questioning the validity of the speaker.) Who else could he possibly call that would shed new light on his argument? Some charlatan?

Defence: Let me get this straight, Madame Artifice. You are Mr. Baden-Clay’s astrologer, correct?
Madame Artifice: Correct.
Defence: And the defendant, Mr. Baden-Clay, was born on 9 September, making him a Virgo, correct?
Madame Artifice: That’s right.
Defence: In your expert opinion, what personality traits does Mr. Baden-Clay possess, being ruled by Mercury, the God of Energy?
Madame Artifice: His traits include a tendency to be born to serve. This gives Virgos great joy.
Defence: So, in your astrological opinion, would it be reasonable to assume that the defendant lived to serve his family selflessly?
Madame Artifice: That is a clear pattern for Virgos, yes.
Defence: Virgo males make for very loyal lovers, is that correct?
Madame Artifice: That is characteristic of a Virgo, indeed.
Defence: I rest my case.
*Stunned silence in courtroom*


Welcome Bekazzled! Wow, what a post! I think I could have three wines reading that if it was a little later at night. You've pretty much summed up everything I think about this case. Thank you so much for your thoughts and opinions.
 
Originally Posted by BJsleuth View Post
One of the girls said mince (ground beef ).

The girl said she had mince for dinner with her family around the dining table.
http://m.couriermail.com.au/news/que...-1226951597398



Yes and TM said she phoned him whilst he was out buying sausages for a BBQ at the Baden-Clay home.

A while back I offered some sort of explanation/theory for this. Many people from Africa eat a unique South African sausage at their barbeques called boerewors. It is a length of sausage in a coil. (Yum !) It can be bought from South African Stores dotted all over Australia (or you can charm you local butcher to prepare it for you...like I do :blushing:)
If you remove the 'sausage' from the casing it is similar to mince and not smooth like an Ausie snag.

[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boerewors"]Boerewors - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]
 
Sorry to quote myself - I have just tried to re read this article but it is no longer available.

I find it odd that not one of the girls said they had a BBQ for dinner, neither did NBC for that matter.

If there were parent teacher interviews for the 3 girls that night what time were they?

Did Allison attend the interviews with GBC?

How late in the evening are parent teacher interviews held, been far to many years since I have attended one to know.

Sorry if this has been answered but from memory PT interview at BSS were at 3:45pm that AFTERNOON!
 
Welcome Bekazzled! Wow, what a post! I think I could have three wines reading that if it was a little later at night. You've pretty much summed up everything I think about this case. Thank you so much for your thoughts and opinions.


My thoughts exactly. Great post Bekazzled.
 
Hi BrizKate, have seen your excellent posts on Oscar Pistorius forum. People are concerned but there are a lot of posters in this forum who have only followed this case. I think the prosecution have a strong circumstantial case and with the accused on the stand now anything can happen. We know the debacle that happened to OP in giving evidence. Gerrie made mincemeat of him in cross examination and their own witness got him sectioned for a psyc evaluation. I can't wait until his trial starts again!

Thanks so much, alioop! And ditto - I love the balance your legal knowledge brings to that forum. Some attorneys aren't quite so open minded. ;) I fully anticipate, come Monday, you and Trooper to give up sleep entirely. :)

A key difference, of course...Pistorius was compelled to testify due to the nature of his defence. GBC not so. It absolutely smacks of narcissism to me.

Some personality disordered defendants (and there are a great many) will actually defer to their legal team but quite a few believe they (knowing better than their legal advocate) can convince the media and/or a jury of their innocence (Scott Peterson, Jodi Arias, Drew Peterson, Jason Young, Darlie Routier, Aileen Wuornos).

Rarely have I seen it work in their favour. I don't know, of course, if GBC is NPD - but he's similar in many ways to other defendants diagnosed as such. (So, imo, is OP.)

JMO

JMO


Please pardon errors as posted via Tapatalk with a less than stellar user.
 
Wow Bekazzled, awesome thoughts, thank you so much for sharing. So well said.
 
Hello all! First-time poster here, though I’ve been following this story as I’ve waited for my username and email address to be verified… and I’m in, yay! I’ve read everyone’s comments and found them all very fascinating – it’s so amazing and fortunate to have a community like this to help analyse the case, and cases like this. I also find it very interesting that many people have brought up intelligent questions and points that seemingly have been overlooked in court (or are not allowed to be discussed in court for some reason or another…. Grrr.). I’m a Brisbanite born and raised and I have to say, in my 37-year lifetime I’ve never come across a local trial like this. When GBC took the stand yesterday, the entire city stood still.

Respectfully snipped by me.

Awesome post Bekazzled and Welcome ! :balloons:
 
If the tidal flow was taken after trial had started it would not be indicative of the crime scene..... tidal flows are different at different times of the year so in order to be accurate they would have had to use data and graphical information from the exact dates the event occurred...not a video from now

Exactly! I posted the attached images sometime last year when we were discussing tides etc. All freely available at the link below.

Click images to enlarge.

Kholo Creek tide chart 19 April 2012.

Tide-Times-19th-April.jpg

Kholo Creek tide chart 30 April 2012.

Tide-Times-30-April.jpg

http://tides.willyweather.com.au/qld/brisbane/brisbane-river--kholo-creek.html
 
A reminder to everyone...

When you post a comment from a media report you must include the relevant link.

Posting a blog link doesn't count.
 
Hello all! First-time poster here, though I’ve been following this story as I’ve waited for my username and email address to be verified… and I’m in, yay! I’ve read everyone’s comments and found them all very fascinating – it’s so amazing and fortunate to have a community like this to help analyse the case, and cases like this. I also find it very interesting that many people have brought up intelligent questions and points that seemingly have been overlooked in court (or are not allowed to be discussed in court for some reason or another…. Grrr.). I’m a Brisbanite born and raised and I have to say, in my 37-year lifetime I’ve never come across a local trial like this. When GBC took the stand yesterday, the entire city stood still.

Before I get into my thoughts, I have a few questions to ask. (Sorry if they’ve been asked already and I missed them during my speed-reading…)

*Urgh, why doesn’t our criminal system allow polygraphs? GBC would be sweating buckets.

*Anyone have a clear idea where GBC is going with TMCH? My first thought was he was going to throw her under the bus. The statement Byrne made – “Allison asked about whether Toni felt bad because he was married, he said she did” – doesn’t seem to make sense because it seems evident that the only thing on her mind was Gerard, Gerard, Gerard. Why would GBC introduce this idea? I can’t think of it as being any use to the defence team?

*One thing keeps playing over in my mind and I don’t quite grasp what it means – in Allison’s diary, she quotes GBC as saying he couldn’t go back to Toni even if he wanted to. Did he insinuate to Allison perhaps that TMCH wouldn’t take him back? Or was he talking about their financial situation or the kids? If it were the latter, I’d think she’d mention the kids in her diary. “Says he is staying with me for kids. Doesn’t love me?” – or something similar? Maybe not – who knows what a person’s really thinking – but I wonder what he meant by telling her this.

*Can someone remind me of the exact day in which the verdict is to be read out?

Thoughts re: GBC’s latest comments…

*Allison’s depression/panic attacks: In reference to the comment that Allison was so panicked that she would “pass out” behind the wheel – in my history of psychological research (I have a degree in psych but also a personal interest in the subject, as well as two family members who suffer from panic attacks – one suffers them while driving), NOTHING suggests that a panic attack would lead to the person to “pass out”. In fact, it’s more likely the opposite: the person suffering a panic attacks has their heart hammering, is feeling extreme heat going all up and down their body, can’t breathe properly and is convinced they will die. They are so consciously fearful and panic attacks are so awful that the hyperactive body is not able to simply “pass out”. In my research and from anecdotal research, NO ONE suffering from a panic attack is at risk of passing out. They will instead suffer through it with a heartbeat so accelerated that at times even others can see the hammering movement of their heart through their chest.

*“Byrne says Allison desperately wanted a son because there were no male Baden-Clays”: OK, this isn’t Game of Thrones. We don’t all seek out male heirs to continue the family line. In fact, NO ONE here does. It’s a modern society here like everywhere else. The Baden-Clays and their snobbery about their name are the exception in Brisbane. To everyone else, banging on and on about the family name is a joke. People are free to marry who they like, to take their partner’s surname only if they wish to, etc etc. The days of men longing for a male heir are LONG past. It is also laughable to suggest that a lack of male heir would make a man want to have an affair?!?! (Who does GBC think he is, Henry VIII?)

*Zoloft: I am on Zoloft for anxiety (which has helped very nicely! I’m now much more able to operate, work, go out into society etc much more than I ever did in my 20s, when I wasn’t on Zoloft.) Zoloft is considered to be so safe that even GPs have the authority to prescribe it. “Gerard said they were told a possible side effect from Zoloft was causing more anxiety, loss of libido.” Though Zoloft has a possible side effect of loss of libido, this is higher in men than in women. (And I myself found no such side effect from Zoloft usage: I am female.) As to Gerard being told that a possible side effect of Zoloft is anxiety (a condition that Zoloft is specifically used to control), a study reported by Melissa Conrad Stoppler, MD found that out of 2,799 test subjects taking Zoloft, only 4 people reported anxiety. (The control group that took a placebo showed that 3 people reported anxiety).
So, this study showed that amongst Zoloft users, 0.14% of patients reported anxiety while using Zoloft. In another study, NHS UK reported that 1 in 100 people who take Sertraline hypochloride “may feel nervous or anxious”.
So, at best, Gerard is suggesting that Allison is part of 0.14%-1% of people who suffer from the very rare side effect of anxiety subsisting from Zoloft usage. Yeah, right.

*“Toni became more demanding, telling him he should leave Allison to be with her. That continued for about three years.” – Who in their right mind will believe this? I believe that TMCH didn’t give a fig about Allison, yes, but what man runs out and has a secret affair – potentially costing him everything – when their mistress is “demanding… for about three years.” What we know of GBC and what I’ve seen of men who have affairs is that they choose women who are NOT problematic – they rush off and have the affair because it’s easy for them, not hard! The mistress is their escapism, not an extra burden they’ve taken on! Sheesh… if she was so “demanding” then why did he keep it going for so long? He can’t say it was fear over Allison finding out. She already found out and he continued the affair! Is he insinuating that he’s so soft and stupid that TMCH had him under the thumb? From all the evidence we’ve heard so far, this is far from the truth. As someone else pointed out earlier, it was a poverty-driven affair: no throwing around of money or spa getaways – it was meet-ups in the back of the car, etc. TMCH basically followed him around and did whatever he wanted. It seemed like Toni was easy for him to manage for the most part (else why continue the affair?) and that he loved how needy she was – she blindly adored him, even though he was married, and until their last conversation seemingly let him do whatever he wanted.
What’s his defence against his physical relationship with TMCH? He tripped, fell, and landed on her in a compromising position – over and over again for 3-4 years? What an unlucky, clumsy fellow he is!

*"To be perfectly candid with you it came to a point where I was doing 80 to 90 to 95 ... I couldn't breastfeed obviously [but] I was doing everything in the home because Allison was in a depressed state that wouldn't really enable her to do anything": OK, even if we’re going to buy these lies of his… Has anyone ever explained to GBC what looking after your child is called? It’s called “fatherhood”. Are we supposed to feel sympathy for him because he helped take care of his child? Did he think Allison would just pump out the babies and take care of everything while he sat in a hammock out the back sipping on Long Island Iced Teas and mentally reliving the glory of Kieran Perkins’ swimming career? Because marriage is supposed to be an equal partnership – i.e. you take care of your kids! Even if he’s telling the truth, he’s still doing less than single fathers have to do.

*“When she was pregnant for the second time she was flat": Really? I don’t have kids but have a lot of younger siblings I helped raise. I remember my mother struggling more or less alone during each pregnancy and birth. And wow, it was totally a breeze! It was all I could do to stop my mother from doing cartwheels! (Sorry about all the sarcasm, but really…?!)

*“She was really feeling incapable of much at all. She spoke to my mum about it. She didn't want to speak to her parents about it”: How convenient that she allegedly told no one but GBC’s family about it. This explanation means no one can contradict GBC except for family members who are already on his side – and they’ve had their time in court already.

*“I can tell you 100 per cent why I didn't tell anybody, I was protecting my beautiful wife”: if he doesn’t stop referencing his “beautiful wife”, I’m going to rush down to the courtroom myself and… God only knows what. We know she was beautiful, yes, but does GBC believe this? Evidently not (infidelity). What man, by the way, constantly refers to his wife as “my beautiful wife” in public? Normal men just say “my wife” when referring to their partner, in the same way women don’t refer to their husbands as “my breathtakingly awesome husband.” I looked at his blog and it made me sick – he’s saying he likes Brigitte Jones’s diary because he likes watching chick flicks with “his beautiful wife”. Wow, he’s got that “beautiful wife” line down pat. What man on their blog or facebook or social media page – no matter how in love with their wife – state that they like a movie because they can watch it with “their beautiful wife”? The fact is, men don’t in normal conversation. Because people aren’t interested in hearing this and your blog/fb profile/social media page is about YOUR likes and interests. I can’t think of one occasion where a husband has publicly said “my beautiful wife” so many times in a row, unless you’re Kanye West or someone equally stupid. And I admit GBC is stupid, but the more someone reiterates the same unusual statement over and over the more I question their truthfulness. While some men may believe their wives are beautiful and love them dearly, they don’t harp on about it in public – people get sick of hearing it; it’s not relevant to the listener.

*Princess Diana/Kieran Perkins/9/11 references: What is this, A Brief History Of Modern Global Events by Gerald Baden Clay? Is he going to bring up Michael Jackson’s death too? How “Hurt Locker” won the Academy Award? The global financial crisis and its implications for iron ore exports out of Australia? Obama’s re-election? GBC, we’re all well aware of these events. If any of us want to check out the hit list of what’s happened over the last decade or so, we’ll look up Wikipedia. Not Badenopedia.

*“Allison was a very gifted ballerina as a child and was under considerable pressure, she felt”: Guess what, so was I. And ballet teachers can be quite nasty and induce nerves. That doesn’t mean that as an adult I’m suffering traumatic flashbacks to the time my teacher screamed at me in front of everyone, stating “I’m starting to regret moving you up to the senior class. Go and stand in the corner for 45 minutes and stare at the wall. No, closer than that! Nose to the wall! Now stay there”. It was bad, yes, but it happened was when I was a child, in a different world where this behaviour was overlooked. Things that happen in your childhood can shape you as a person but something like this does not have an impact on your daily life as an adult, in my experience. Nor is there any research out there to correlating pressure received as a child from ballet teachers with raising your children as an adult!

*“Byrne back up. Saying Gerard had no intention of being with Toni. Told her 1 July but knew it wouldn't happen.” Hey, this happens to be one part of the defence argument that may be true. I think his skill was in placating women. I think he murdered Allison for the money alone (and maybe the free-swinging single lifestyle). I’m not a mathematician, but he was about $1 million in debt. Allison’s life insurance was around $1 million. What an odd coincidence!!! I always felt he only kept TMCH stringing along, just placating her and taking whatever pleasure he could from her. And now he seems to be throwing her under the bus, this just confirms my suspicion.

*Traded down from Lexus to Captiva: Oh, wow, what a come-down! How could he live with this economic desolation? Having to downgrade a car to accommodate a changed financial situation – what a tragedy. I’m sure the starving, poverty-stricken refugees in Africa are feeling sympathy for GBC’s monetary issues. (Sorry, but his woe-is-me story just drives me insane...)

*Are we really going to have to endure The Dull History of GBC’s Travels & Work History for days to come? I’m trying to think of what witnesses the defence could possibly call. Forensic guys who might try to discredit the prosecution’s forensic experts’ arguments, yes, but the defence has already covered this in response to the prosecution witnesses. (Through stupid arguments questioning the validity of the speaker.) Who else could he possibly call that would shed new light on his argument? Some charlatan?

Defence: Let me get this straight, Madame Artifice. You are Mr. Baden-Clay’s astrologer, correct?
Madame Artifice: Correct.
Defence: And the defendant, Mr. Baden-Clay, was born on 9 September, making him a Virgo, correct?
Madame Artifice: That’s right.
Defence: In your expert opinion, what personality traits does Mr. Baden-Clay possess, being ruled by Mercury, the God of Energy?
Madame Artifice: His traits include a tendency to be born to serve. This gives Virgos great joy.
Defence: So, in your astrological opinion, would it be reasonable to assume that the defendant lived to serve his family selflessly?
Madame Artifice: That is a clear pattern for Virgos, yes.
Defence: Virgo males make for very loyal lovers, is that correct?
Madame Artifice: That is characteristic of a Virgo, indeed.
Defence: I rest my case.
*Stunned silence in courtroom*


Please keep up your great posts!!
 
Well I am the wrong person to ask because I thought it would be all over this week but I was so wrong about GBC giving evidence! So it seems there is his evidence to finish which could take a few days including cross examination, then they have other witnesses as well so it will go Monday to Thursday next week at least. Probably into the following week too.


Hi BritsKate , have seen your excellent posts on Oscar Pistorius forum. People are concerned but there are a lot of posters in this forum who have only followed this case. I think the prosecution have a strong circumstantial case and with the accused on the stand now anything can happen. We know the debacle that happened to OP in giving evidence. Gerrie made mincemeat of him in cross examination and their own witness got him sectioned for a psyc evaluation. I can't wait until his trial starts again!

I'm not sure the trial will go over the allocated four weeks??

Pistorious trial resumes on Monday if anyone is interested in following it...


[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=536"]Oscar Pistorius - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]
 
Here's an interesting article "How can you expose the lies of the Narcissist in a court of law? He acts so convincing!"

http://samvak.tripod.com/5.html#Court

Thank you Zorro
I have just spent the last half hour reading items on this site.

This is from 'The cult of the narcissist' it gave me goose bumps.

The narcissist's cult is "missionary" and "imperialistic". He is always on the lookout for new recruits – his spouse's friends, his daughter's girlfriends, his neighbours, new colleagues at work. He immediately attempts to "convert" them to his "creed" – to convince them how wonderful and admirable he is. In other words, he tries to render them Sources of Narcissistic Supply.

Often, his behaviour on these "recruiting missions" is different to his conduct within the "cult". In the first phases of wooing new admirers and proselytising to potential "conscripts" – the narcissist is attentive, compassionate, empathic, flexible, self-effacing, reasonable and helpful. At home, among the "veterans" he is tyrannical, demanding, wilful, opinionated, aggressive, and exploitative.

As the leader of his congregation, the narcissist feels entitled to special amenities and benefits not accorded the "rank and file".He expects to be waited on hand and foot, to make free use of everyone's money and dispose of their assets (and even their bodies) liberallyand to be cynically exempt from the rules that he himself established (if such violation is pleasurable or gainful).

In extreme cases, the narcissist feels above the law – any kind of law. This grandiose and haughty conviction leads to criminal acts, incestuous or polygamous relationships, and recurrent friction with the authorities.

BBM
 
Kathleen Mitchell Award

to Trooper, please!


:thewave:
 
Exactly! I posted the attached images sometime last year when we were discussing tides etc. All freely available at the link below.

Click images to enlarge.

Kholo Creek tide chart 19 April 2012.

View attachment 44640

Kholo Creek tide chart 30 April 2012.

View attachment 44641

http://tides.willyweather.com.au/qld/brisbane/brisbane-river--kholo-creek.html
..... and Steve Courtney who lives in Anstead was witness early in the Trial. He said that he is very familiar with Ugly Gully Creek and gave details of the fast flowing that occurred there and his estimates of tide heights and distances to areas nearby; also width measurement (think he said 3 m) of the creek itself under the bridge.
 
*“Byrne back up. Saying Gerard had no intention of being with Toni. Told her 1 July but knew it wouldn't happen.” Hey, this happens to be one part of the defence argument that may be true. I think his skill was in placating women. I think he murdered Allison for the money alone (and maybe the free-swinging single lifestyle). I’m not a mathematician, but he was about $1 million in debt. Allison’s life insurance was around $1 million. What an odd coincidence!!! I always felt he only kept TMCH stringing along, just placating her and taking whatever pleasure he could from her. And now he seems to be throwing her under the bus, this just confirms my suspicion.

Hi & welcome to Websleuths Bekazzled :)

Re the line I've bolded...I think he did have every intention of picking up with TM...but only for the $$$$s.

Text copied from Toni McHugh's statement...

37. After Rob and I separated we sold our house at....I received a lump sump of $100,000.................
Gerard knew exactly how much I had received in settlement
.

[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=9048162&postcount=17"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Bail Hearing Documents *No Discussion*[/ame]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
112
Guests online
4,318
Total visitors
4,430

Forum statistics

Threads
592,545
Messages
17,970,752
Members
228,805
Latest member
Val in PA
Back
Top