My questions will be more geared to what I know about a restraining order and how they usually work and the answers I am looking for are how and why they would be different in this scenari

nce again I am not making an argument just trying to better understand what exactly was going on.
1)........once this motion for a restraining order was filed wouldn't the defendant(LE) be served a notice telling them of the filling and given an order to cease and desist of certain actions....until a hearing was held and a judge made a ruling.
2)........since LE publicly stated they would give Evans a courtesy call when they indicted his client and this was the basis for the restraining order wouldn't this bump it into an emergency status which usually requires a hearing within 10 days.
3).....If they went ahead and got a indictment and then later a ruling about the restraining order was made favorable for SA.Clearly that indictment would be tossed and wouldn't this create huge problems if they ever tried to indict him again?
.....for example they wanted to indict him for disposing of Holly's body and they went ahead and got this indictment....the court upheld the restraining order later and tossed the indictment.Wouldn't it be much harder to then re-indict him rather then wait and even if the court upheld this restraining motion try and get it reversed before seeking an indictment.
#3 is a rather confusing question......basically I am asking if they got an indictment and then later the restraining order was imposed could the judge in his ruling make that certain one or any further indictments against SA for that crime or any of the ones covered under his immunity deal impossible?