Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is there a who's who list of these folks under investigation and what they've either been charged with or under investigation for?
If he supposedly admitted that way back on Sept 17th, then why weren't the charges for the rape filed at the same time the charges for tampering with evidence filed?
If he supposedly admitted that way back on Sept 17th, then why weren't the charges for the rape filed at the same time the charges for tampering with evidence filed?
I was wondering that too Hatfield.
something I am trying to figure out too.
Is there a who's who list of these folks under investigation and what they've either been charged with or under investigation for?
Just taking a "wild guess" here: Could it be they needed Grand Jury indictments for the "forcible rape" charges, and the GJ did not meet until this morning ?
From News Channel 5 today:
The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation said 26-year-old John Dylan Adams was indicted Tuesday morning by a special Grand Jury in Decatur County on two counts of rape.
Link: http://www.jrn.com/newschannel5/news...279156481.html
From WSMV today :
A special grand jury in Decatur County returned indictments against Adams on Tuesday morning.
Link: http://www.wsmv.com/story/26782753/s...counts-of-rape
This is a great development.
But Hatfield, you make some great points. I'd add one more to them, mentioned again in the above referenced articles, where the wording being used sounds like TBI is skirting transparency somehow, and that the real story might be different than they are telling. (In this one, we actually know the spin story, and the real story.).
I want to trust what they say, but this keeps making me wary.
TBI version to the media: Through information developed over the course of the investigation, TBI agents learned last month that 26-year old John Dylan Adams of Holladay disposed of items he knew to be of evidentiary value to the case, the agency said.
"Information developed" ..."course of the investigation"....words that sound like a long investigatory path in which they dug out facts, pieced them together, and that led them to this conclusion.
Reality: the "information developed over the course of the investigation," as the agency worded it, was (according to the court documents) actually nothing more than listening to what Dylan Adams had said to them the same day they arrested him, and then locking him up for it.
Why the spin, rather than transparency? Deliberate deception bothers me, and makes me wonder where else they are fudging the facts for appearances.
Mark Pearcy:
- Charged with Accessory After the Fact and Tampering with Evidence
- Not in jail
Jeff Pearcy:
- Charged with Accessory After the Fact and Tampering with Evidence
- Currently in jail
Yeah the two counts is puzzling to me as well. Would that mean two separate incidences? Both on the day she disappeared? .
Wonder why no kidnapping charges?
FYI, the actual jail status on those two is the opposite of how you have it listed. MP is in jail, JP is not.