popsicle
faith hope love
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2009
- Messages
- 22,113
- Reaction score
- 304
One of the pics in the shower show an ungloved hand very near the body, so I don't know.
except it's clearly a decomposing body at that point.
One of the pics in the shower show an ungloved hand very near the body, so I don't know.
One of the pics in the shower show an ungloved hand very near the body, so I don't know.
Hi Guys
Just wanted to say thank you once again for all your efforts in keeping us updated with the trial. Is very much appreciated. Was able to spent all morning at work catching up with yesterdays trial.
I have a quick question though, the 20 pictures that were deleted from the camera, did hse actually take those after she had killed him and he was dead? Or am I getting confused? xxxx
Wonder why she washed his body? Wonder why she took photos of the commission of this crime and the aftermath? What does all that mean, psychically? Were they able to recover the photos she took of him dead or dying in the shower, anyone know?
I keep reading the same questions over and over. If you are just tuning in to the trial now, perhaps it would help to go back and read this trial thread from the beginning. Many of these questions are already answered.
I just started a media/timeline/no discussion thread here:
Jodi Arias Trial media and timeline thread **no discussion** - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community
anyone can post links there and it will keep them in one place
nana, also read this that popsicle posted on the last thread
Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Jodi Arias Trial media and timeline thread **no discussion**
it describes how she took 20 or so pictures of him in the shower and then deleted them
I am not convinced we really know what is in this photo. DA seems to say you can see her "foot". Not once have I heard it used as the word "shoe". With that being said, I don't think the spot on the floor looks like a foot, I think it's just coincidence. The sense of scale is WAY off for it to be TA's or JA's foot.
I also saw the outline of the shoe that someone posted earlier. Was she wearing all black shoes? I have a hard time believing so. I'm still not convinced. Also, keep in mind that the PHOTO ON THE CAMERA WAS TAKEN UPSIDE DOWN. So this would have been the true orientation on the camera. Does this help anyone??
I am not convinced we really know what is in this photo. DA seems to say you can see her "foot". Not once have I heard it used as the word "shoe". With that being said, I don't think the spot on the floor looks like a foot, I think it's just coincidence. The sense of scale is WAY off for it to be TA's or JA's foot.
I also saw the outline of the shoe that someone posted earlier. Was she wearing all black shoes? I have a hard time believing so. I'm still not convinced. Also, keep in mind that the PHOTO ON THE CAMERA WAS TAKEN UPSIDE DOWN. So this would have been the true orientation on the camera. Does this help anyone??
Hi all I have been following the trial, and following along with you guys here, and just didn't think I had anything to add until now! I have read through all the discussions from last night/early this morning about the 'dragging photo'.
My take on it. If you look at what popsicle posted, it is stated that the picture had to be rotated because it was upside down. This tells me that the camera was upside down. I think it's very possible that she was dragging him by his arms, walking backwards, and stepped on the camera. It does look like his right arm is up, but to me it doesn't look like she is holding it up. It could be that she was startled by the camera, let go of his arm at that point, and this is just the position that the camera caught. I know the camera's we have, there is a delay between the noise/light and the actual pic taken. Just a thought
I am curious if they ever found JA's clothes? I don't think I have read anything about that. She had alot of space and time to get rid of them though.
I knew of the story, but never really followed this case until now. I am trying to get caught up with everyone else and just viewed the photos. Travis is not a small man. That first blow had to be to his heart for her to over power him like she did...IMHO. She did a lot of damage to Travis' body. A LOT! Does anyone know how big she is? Height and weight?
Those defensive wounds and the cut to his neck look like a rage killing to me. I hope justice is done in this case.
Information that I have seen shows...
Jodi Arias: 5ft 4in, 115 lbs
Travis Alexander: 5ft 9in, 185 lbs
I am not convinced we really know what is in this photo. DA seems to say you can see her "foot". Not once have I heard it used as the word "shoe". With that being said, I don't think the spot on the floor looks like a foot, I think it's just coincidence. The sense of scale is WAY off for it to be TA's or JA's foot.
I also saw the outline of the shoe that someone posted earlier. Was she wearing all black shoes? I have a hard time believing so. I'm still not convinced. Also, keep in mind that the PHOTO ON THE CAMERA WAS TAKEN UPSIDE DOWN. So this would have been the true orientation on the camera. Does this help anyone??