Wasn't he being referred for surgery by the first hospital? Perhaps why he went to the second hospital?
He went to the hospital in NOLA for injuries he said resulted from a mugging.
Wasn't he being referred for surgery by the first hospital? Perhaps why he went to the second hospital?
It says he was treated "for his May 19th injuries," not that he was treated on May 19th. I couldn't find the day he was actually treated at Opelousas, did I miss it?
He could have sought treatment at Opelousas a day later, or a week later, and he'd still have to explain where he got the injuries, and that was on May 19th. Otherwise, he'd have to make up a new story about where the injuries came from. No matter when he got treatment, they're still his "May 19th injuries."
Very confusing. I don't understand why he would go to two hospitals unless he had the poison ivy and finger treated first and then went home and recieved the stab injuries and then went on to New Orleans. That doesn't make sense either though.
It could account for police saying they know where he was during those hours.
He was a very busy man.
CS- The reporter's error surprises me... I'm sure you saw the wrong date in the article.
A City Hall security camera captured Shunick on her bike at 1:48 a.m. July 19 on St. Landry Street near University Avenue, about the same time a white Chevrolet Z71 was caught on tape at the intersection traveling in the same direction.
Interesting about the poison ivy (if accurate). Searchers need to look for areas near water with poison ivy close by. Of course that probably describes most of Louisiana in the summer.
Added an additional thought about 2nd hospital visit: The cut to his finger may have been more severe than first thought, or scar tissue (given the fact that he has a tendency to keloid) may have been a complication that needed remedy. Wonder what the date was for the OG visit.
I think it's possible that it's an alibi. But to me, what makes more sense is that he needed medical attention and didn't want to do it close to home. The whole jurisdiction blindness thing ... MOOI think he was fully injured by the time he showed up at Ochsner. I think he left Ochsner, however, before being fully treated, due to the cops getting a bit suspicious of his story.
Going to NOLA was all about establishing some sort of alibi--whether believable or not, that's not the point--IMO.
So then he shows up at Opelousas General. He says he was injured in NOLA on May 19th and he reported it to LE there. Perhaps he even shows them proof of a police report. They ask no further questions on that, and just treat him for his injuries.
I did misread that and now notice that there is no date for this hospital visit - thanks for pointing that out. BUT....if he was using this as an "also" on the May 19th injuries why wouldn't the finger have been treated as well in NOLA? How could they treat the stab wounds and not the finger? Or do you think they referred him for other treatment/surgery on the finger at a location closer to his home?
I don't want to aggravate anyone I just think we need to give at least some reasonable doubt until we see all evidence. Even if it is just 1% reasonable doubt.
I have been sure of his guilt since day one but am trying to open up my mind a little and at least consider he isn't the devil we all claim he is.
Almost had his finger cut off?
Sure sounds like he had some nerve injury or something!
http://www.theind.com/news/10949-lavergnes-lacerated-finger-poison-ivy-treated-at-opelousas-general
"Our sources say doctors at the hospital performed surgery on his finger, and note that at the time Lavergne also was suffering from an extensive breakout of poison ivy. Its unclear if he went to the Opelousas hospital immediately after returning from New Orleans and whether he was treated on a single visit."
Wasn't he being referred for surgery to his finger by the first hospital? Perhaps why he went to the second hospital?
I guess what has led me to believe it was a crime of opportunity is that it would be much easier (I think) to abduct someone on foot. There are plenty of young women around that time of night, many intoxicated and not fully aware of their surroundings, that would be an easier target. Why not follow and grab one of these girls on their way into their home?
Intentionally hitting a bike rider for an abduction takes a lot if risk. It could draw unwanted attention, you could be seen exiting your vehicle, there could be an undetermined amount of time to retrieve the bike and victim, you would have to control the victim while you fooled with the bike, the victim would at least suffer some injury and may bleed leaving DNA in your vehicle. It is just so unpredictable knowing where the victim and bike will both end up and knowing how much force to use for the desired result.
If this was not an accident then I think it had to just be an uncontrollable impulse to grab her by any means possible.
This all keeps me believing that it was not preplanned and he probably had to make some quick decisions on how he would cover his tracks.
Just my :twocents: and I am probably totally wrong, but I'm not sure that Mickey was the actual target for him that night. I think she was just the girl that was there at that time.
I do feel that possibly the disappearance and then finding of BW's bike was planned - again not that BW was a target, just a bike in the vicinity to test the waters with and it happened to be his. I think that possibly BSL had been scoping the area, knew that bumping a bike would throw a person off it and give him the edge he needed, and he was planning everything.
I think it is possible that he worked every detail out (except for Mickey fighting back) - by that I mean bumping a bike, getting the person off it, getting them into the vehicle, where to throw the bike and when so that it may never be found, where to take the girl, etc.
That girl just happened to be Mickey - wrong time, wrong place, wrong day.
But when she fought back, he got injured, he then had to rethink and work on things he hadn't planned on...lot's of media attention, evidence in his truck (so now he had to think of how to get rid of the evidence), the injuries (which I do believe he then thought would be an alibi of him being in a different town at the time), etc.
He had it planned in his mind up to a certain point - and then things deviated from his plans and he had to rethink. That is what gave him up....Mickey fought, he got injured, his truck was captured on video, the bike was found (thank you water level drop and astute fishermen), and he was now flustered...he didn't plan on all of this.
And that is why he is sitting in jail on these charges.
JMOO
Almost had his finger cut off?
Sure sounds like he had some nerve injury or something!
http://www.theind.com/news/10949-lavergnes-lacerated-finger-poison-ivy-treated-at-opelousas-general
"Our sources say doctors at the hospital performed surgery on his finger, and note that at the time Lavergne also was suffering from an extensive breakout of poison ivy. Its unclear if he went to the Opelousas hospital immediately after returning from New Orleans and whether he was treated on a single visit."
Very confusing. I don't understand why he would go to two hospitals unless he had the poison ivy and finger treated first and then went home and recieved the stab injuries and then went on to New Orleans. That doesn't make sense either though. It could account for police saying they know where he was during those hours. He was a very busy man.