Is it possible she was being abused by more than 1 person?
danablue1,
Sure, it's possible, many have suggested this took place.
Is it possible she was being abused by more than 1 person?
Fair enough but you don't know what they were doing under the covers. They could have been eating candy who knows? If BR was a known sexual abuser to the R's shouldn't they be preventing other children from being around him but they weren't. Why were they allowed to have bedrooms on the same floor let alone sleeping in the same bedroom? They were on the 3rd floor unable to see or hear anything. Any theories on the 911 call placed by someone in the Ramsey house on 12/23?
That's one for JR or PR. They slept in each others bed, the room aspect is just folks being polite about the situation.Why were they allowed to have bedrooms on the same floor let alone sleeping in the same bedroom?
Has to be someone wanting to report an assault of some kind, but being over-ridden by the Ramsey's who likely said we'll deal with it?Any theories on the 911 call placed by someone in the Ramsey house on 12/23?
icedtea4me,
Thanks for the clarification, any idea why PR or JR would not have had Murder In The First Degree Counts leveled at them?
.
icedtea4me,
Thanks for the clarification, any idea why PR or JR would not have had Murder In The First Degree Counts leveled at them?
.
icedtea4me,
Apparently, neither can JR or PR be apprehended, prosecuted, convicted, and punished. Exonerated.
<snip>
Kolar's remarks about Burke's pajamas:
Foreign Faction, Who Really Kidnapped JonBenet, James Kolar, pages 370 - 371
There were other police reports in the files that documented what I thought could be viewed as related behavior. CSIs had written about finding a pair of pajama bottoms in JonBenét’s bedroom that contained fecal material. They were too big for her and were thought to belong to Burke.
<snip>I don’t understand why people refuse to see the forest for the trees!
Blue and fuzzy could also come from a sweater just saying
It doesn't occur to Kolar nor you that just because a pair of pajama pants may be too big for JonBenet doesn't mean that they still fit Burke.
Hmm... It's extremely telling that BDIs have this unquenchable need to distance themselves from an adult being the perpetrator of JonBenet's murder.
Count I would've logically been the Murder in the First Degree charge set by the prosecution for John and for Patsy. The fact that neither John nor Patsy were indicted on Count I means that each received 8 or fewer votes.
So you're saying both PR and JR committed murder in the first degree. PR starting it with JR finishing it because she botched it and both also assisting each other in the cover up?icedtea4me,
How many times have I posted it was likely PR who asphyxiated JonBenet?
With the outside possibility Patsy messed up a first attempt then JR took over and asphyxiated JonBenet?
What took place on Christmas night in Boulder was not a simple IDI or a linear RDI straight out some CSI episode.
.
Hmm... It's extremely telling that BDIs have this unquenchable need to distance themselves from an adult being the perpetrator of JonBenet's murder.
So you're saying both PR and JR committed murder in the first degree. PR starting it with JR finishing it because she botched it and both also assisting each other in the cover up?
icedtea4me,
I just knew you’d reply to this comment.
Please share with us your theory based on the evidence.
icedtea4me,
Yikes, so if they are too small for BR and too large for JonBenet what are they doing lying on JonBenet's bedroom floor containing fecal matter?<snip>
16 TOM HANEY: How about 378?
17 PATSY RAMSEY: This is JonBenet's floor, her
18 pants.
19 TOM HANEY: Do you recall those particular
20 pants, when she would have worn those last?
21 PATSY RAMSEY: Not for sure. Probably
22 recently because they are dropped in the middle of the
23 floor, but I don't remember exactly.
24 TOM HANEY: They are kind of inside out.
25 PATSY RAMSEY: Right.
0457
1 TOM HANEY: 379 is a close up of it. It
2 appears they are stained.
3 PATSY RAMSEY: Right.
4 TOM HANEY: Is that something that JonBenet
5 had a problem with?
6 PATSY RAMSEY: Well she, you know, she was at
7 age where she was learning to wipe herself and, you
8 know, sometimes she wouldn't do such a great job.
http://www.acandyrose.com/1998BPD-Patsy-Interview-Complete.htm
Are you saying JonBenet isn't allowed to wear bigger pants?
Patsy catching John and JonBenet engaging in a sex act.
<snip>Your quote from acandyrose has absolutely nothing to do with the pajama bottoms found lying on JonBenet's bedroom floor, which I'm speculating belonged to Burke Ramsey?
The pants Haney and Patsy are discussing were left on her bathroom floor!
I have a theory as to why Burke Ramsey's pajama bottoms were left on JonBenet's bedroom floor, and it relates to aspects of Kolar's theory.
Take note that Patsy says: Well she, you know, she was at age where she was learning to wipe herself and, you know, sometimes she wouldn't do such a great job.
Same cannot be said for Burke Ramsey, is Patsy simply misinforming Haney here?
<snip>If those pajama bottoms are colored Blue then its a red-flag suggesting the case is BDI.
You have to wonder why BPD never sent any fecal matter from the pajamas to the lab for analysis, or did they, and sat on the results?