tedtink
Blunderwoman
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2020
- Messages
- 3,841
- Reaction score
- 21,006
Paragraph 2 and 4 ?? CB and NF ???
Which would mean NF could not have been on the phone number mentioned as it was outside PDL
Last edited:
Paragraph 2 and 4 ?? CB and NF ???
Madeleine McCann cops 'have just 22 months to nail prime suspect'
Never really understood the point of these staute of limitations for bringing a crime to trial. Why should there be a time limit to get away with something?
I think we're missing a piece in the puzzle. I keep thinking this was well planned. CB had the right connections through IAPRS. But there's something missing, perhaps this purple woman. We know she was on the phone, but we don't know if she was doing a real call, so she might not be logged anyway.
Maybe she was talking into a cigarette packet...
LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
Now we must find out which brand.
Camel?
That's a very good hypothesis, Ted.
And me, please. If I can be in the PM group with LE , CB and HCW that’d be great
ETA: why do your emojis get included and mine get wiped out?
Sorry but where is the source for the purple top white skirt lady using (or pretending to use) a phone please? The reports I've seen make no mention using a phone. Examples
Madeleine McCann witness 'saw car driving down wrong way towards apartment where tot was sleeping before seeing mystery woman in purple waiting outside'
'Woman in purple' is now prime suspect in Madeleine McCann disappearance
Now a car driving wrong way. That was such a busy night in such a quiet villa.
That sounds like she said, a rental car, someone driving who didn't know their way around PDL IMO.
If you were the perp, why risk getting stopped by LE for driving up the wrong way of the street?
Oh I forgot - LE probably wouldn't have noticed.