Allusonz
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2010
- Messages
- 4,679
- Reaction score
- 17
Thanks Allusonz! Okay - I'm confused. My question is: were there bloody footprints?
From your post, I'm gathering that there were bloody footprints - but that Stephanoni said she did not test the blood for DNA? or that it was even blood?
And we have been looking at the pictures right? The pictures of the footprints are legitimate, right? They came from the evidence files somewhere, right?
Salem
yes there were bloody footprints attributed to RG but not RS or AK
there was also footprints detected by luminol which tested negative for blood (it was these footprints detected by luminol that Stephanoni stated were not tested for blood on the stand i believe in April of 2009 dont quote me on the date) these were DNA ones only though
Some of the footprints posted are legitimate ones others have not been, i am trying to think back through the threads