Dotta
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2021
- Messages
- 10,777
- Reaction score
- 65,108
I bet he will call himself a victim of persecution.Ha excellent! I bet he’s regretting his ego about now?
It is turning into a tragifarce
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I bet he will call himself a victim of persecution.Ha excellent! I bet he’s regretting his ego about now?
I bet he will call himself a victim of persecution.
It is turning into tragifarse
WOW! what a mess. I also can see a Life Time movie... I have my idea of who will play Maxwell, but I can't think of who could play good o'Scotty. He'll probably want to play himself. I feel so sad for these victims.
WOW! what a mess. I also can see a Life Time movie... I have my idea of who will play Maxwell, but I can't think of who could play good o'Scotty. He'll probably want to play himself. I feel so sad for these victims.
Provided there will not be scenes with guns!Alec Baldwin for Scotty?
Really good point.The juror might also be incorrect in thinking he swayed the rest of the jury.
And guess what???One question I have is the court arranged a solicitor for him but he said he didnt want it as I understand and instead he got his own who is someone who represented a big case if I understand correctly. Why would you want a high profile one in theory? I mean if you have done nothing wrong why not take the free one the courts had arranged for you?
One question I have is the court arranged a solicitor for him but he said he didnt want it as I understand and instead he got his own who is someone who represented a big case if I understand correctly. Why would you want a high profile one in theory? I mean if you have done nothing wrong why not take the free one the courts had arranged for you?
He may have perjured himself on the questionnaire is one reason, the high profile of this case is a second reason. I’m sure there are many more but I’d rather be ‘in charge’ of instructing my own lawyer.
I did watch part of his interview on the DailyMail site and I don’t think he’s the sharpest knife in the drawer. IMO MOO
He may have perjured himself on the questionnaire is one reason, the high profile of this case is a second reason. I’m sure there are many more but I’d rather be ‘in charge’ of instructing my own lawyer.
I did watch part of his interview on the DailyMail site and I don’t think he’s the sharpest knife in the drawer. IMO MOO
Does this mean that stupidity is the excuse for jeopardising a trial?I did watch part of his interview on the DailyMail site and I don’t think he’s the sharpest knife in the drawer. IMO MOO
He may have perjured himself on the questionnaire is one reason, the high profile of this case is a second reason. I’m sure there are many more but I’d rather be ‘in charge’ of instructing my own lawyer.
I did watch part of his interview on the DailyMail site and I don’t think he’s the sharpest knife in the drawer. IMO MOO
But the problem lies elsewhere.
Everybody has a right to unprejudiced jury.
A juror must answer truthfully to all the questions in the survey.
It is then for lawyers to decide if she/he is fit to be in Jury.
Other thing, it is wrong if a juror's ego jeopardises the trial.
It means victims' suffering in case of a retrial.
MOO
I totally agree with you.
BUT, I’d like to point out that this kind of rogue juror and his (their) behaviour, turns Ghislaine into a victim as well. IMO
This man has given at least two different answers to a question that should have been answered with the utmost honesty to ensure a water tight trial. Then, he should have gone home and kept quiet. IMO
One question I have is the court arranged a solicitor for him but he said he didnt want it as I understand and instead he got his own who is someone who represented a big case if I understand correctly. Why would you want a high profile one in theory? I mean if you have done nothing wrong why not take the free one the courts had arranged for you?
Interested to know if this own lawyer of his, being involved in another high profile case, is expensive?
My original thought, albeit outrageous, is starting to feel more possible… I think he’s been bought off. MOO