Odds of the SA having solid proof?

Discussion in 'Caylee Anthony 2 years old' started by Tulessa, Feb 28, 2011.

  1. Tulessa

    Tulessa Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    22,165
    Likes Received:
    176
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I'm thinking that since they are tossing out a lot of evidence, that MAYBE, JUST MAYBE, they have some solid proof that we are not aware of?
    Thoughts?
     
  2. Loading...


  3. LolaMoon08

    LolaMoon08 Active Member

    Messages:
    7,128
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    What did I miss? What are they tossing out?
     
  4. LambChop

    LambChop Former Member

    Messages:
    21,160
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I could think of but one reason and that would be CA suddenly realizing the only way to keep KC from the DP is for CA to admit there was a big fight on June 15th and that KC flew into a rage and may have hurt Caylee and then tried to cover up. Someone telling the truth in this case would be refreshing and it might make KC realize she needs to avoid the trial at any costs and try to plead out. jmo
     
  5. MissJames

    MissJames a yellowflutterby changed my life : )

    Messages:
    6,552
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I hope so ? :waitasec:

    Actually ,I have the utmost confidence in LDB and JA. I'm not sure there is absolute proof,but I think they have a solid case.
     
  6. Solace

    Solace New Member

    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I would also like to know what is being tossed.
     
  7. tygomuk

    tygomuk New Member

    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    IMO there is ample evidence that ICA is guilty and a liar and therefore I think the SA could not put too much emphasis on her statements as truth given her history. If her statements are BS anyway why even go there.
     
  8. noor

    noor Member

    Messages:
    631
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16

    Oh, I think the prosecution wants to keep it simple.
     
  9. strawberry

    strawberry Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    11,799
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    48
    They're just not going to use the 12/11/08 video of her reaction, or Maya's testimony.
     
  10. chefmom

    chefmom Seriously! Ancient Aliens!

    Messages:
    4,524
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No biggie! They don't need them, IMO. They have enough with the 31 days, partying, tattoo, and all of the lies.
     
  11. LolaMoon08

    LolaMoon08 Active Member

    Messages:
    7,128
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    The video - I never thought it was going to be seen by a jury anyways and I don't think it is that much of a loss anyways. I think Casey's phone call home where she talks to Cindy, Lee and Kristina is much more important and trumps the video of her learning about Caylee's (or a childs) remains being found on December 11th, 2008.

    As for Maya... she just isn't trustworthy and I don't think the SA needs her.

    Now if the duct tape gets tossed... I will panic!
     
  12. denjet

    denjet New Member

    Messages:
    919
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I was pleased to see the State drop some of the "nonsense" evidence ... I'm very sure they don't need it ... IMO Maya didn't come across as truthful, the 10/14 conversation after her indictment but before her booking when Baez wasn't present didn't reveal anything about the crime anyway .. just what a cold witch KC was, and the 12/11 video also, IMO, didn't prove any facts and could have been interpreted in different ways ...

    It's great that the state is taking some of the focus off of what happened after KC was arrested and not giving Jose the chance to focus on it as a part of the big conspiracy against his client ... I think it's extra special that Jose's spent so much time chasing his tail and it won't even be used ... LOL
     
  13. strawberry

    strawberry Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    11,799
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Exactly.
     
  14. kaRN

    kaRN Verified Health Professional - Registered Nurse

    Messages:
    4,753
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I don't believe Cindy's word on anything to be credible so admitting to a fight now is right up there with suggesting there was an accidental drowning. Means nothing to me. I don't care one way or the other if the jailhouse tape is introduced ior not. Sounds pretty circumstantial IMO anyway. Maybe she got a sudden cramp and started her period while the news was on- "Oh no." Who knows.
    The jury will have enough dealing with all ICA's innapropriate gestures, facial expressions and tics as is without the jail tape. I have full confidence that relinquishing a tape now, the state probably never intended on introducing anyway is all part of some brilliant prosecution strategy. JMO
     
  15. Intermezzo

    Intermezzo Active Member

    Messages:
    10,308
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Tulessa,
    bbm
    I don't think they do...this is a IMO strong circumstantial evidence case and the ASA's are tossing out evidence/discovery they don't need or are unable to use for whatever reason..

    We now know the State is not going to use 1) Maya D's statement 2)the statements she made to LE (the chit chat) after being indicted when Jose wasn't around and 3) video of her reaction the day Caylee's remains were found.
     
  16. krisskross

    krisskross New Member

    Messages:
    423
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :yes: :yes: :yes:

    And I'm hoping LDB's Motion in Limine results in Baez' conspiracy innuendo being severely curtailed during the trial.

    I predict a very one sided affair. :floorlaugh:
     
  17. kaRN

    kaRN Verified Health Professional - Registered Nurse

    Messages:
    4,753
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    They'll use neither.
     
  18. TotallyObsessed

    TotallyObsessed New Member

    Messages:
    6,096
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nope - just strong circumstantial evidence. I don't believe there is a "smoking gun" per se, but as a whole, a possible "smoking bazooka"....:)
     
  19. Leila

    Leila Active Member

    Messages:
    12,378
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    When I read the news that the state is not going to use Casey's reaction to the news of the remains found, the testimony of Maya Derkovic, or Casey's statement to LE that they "wouldn't trick her into a confession", my immediate reaction was that the state must feel they've got substantial proof without using all the evidence they've got. It would appear the state is going with the strongest evidence, and concentrate on that evidence.

    I think the forensic evidence is going to be strong. I also think the witness testimony from Casey's former friends will be strong, and even the testimony from George, Cindy, and Lee will be compelling. A good prosecutor will be able to elicit the testimony despite efforts on the Anthonys to spin it their way. I also think DC's testimony will be a major factor.
     
  20. denjet

    denjet New Member

    Messages:
    919
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's extra special that all of Jose's hard work deposing all of the jail personnel and LE he claimed were involved in the "big setup" that day was for nothing ... :D
     
  21. Solace

    Solace New Member

    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    FWIW, I would not use any of the above either. Firstly Mila, I believe, has been transferred to a better place, secondly KCs reaction could be taken either way and third KCs statement re tricking is no big deal. So she said that so what. Doesn't make her guilty.

    It is not shocking to me.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice