- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
- Messages
- 23,316
- Reaction score
- 124,307
State will present texts between Jake and Hanna. Andy talking. Nature of relationship between them is relevant to the motive, etc. regarding custody.
Defense gets to argue before its admitted.
Oct 21, 2013 til ? Says these texts pre-date the incident.
AC says Jakes texts, threats before S was born are consistent, spread out over so much time that he threatened to take her away before she was even born.
AC says GW4 not being involved, the point is, like with Tabitha, when GW4 ran her off and took custody, the whole family was involved in that effort, just as they were when fighting for Jake to get custody by getting rid of Hanna.
Judge says he thinks its too early in their relationship to assume those disagreements could be considered part of the motive for murder.
AC is arguing that when Jake says "this child will always be with me" it indicates his mindset and how he controlled things after that regarding Sophia.
Defense gets to argue before its admitted.
Oct 21, 2013 til ? Says these texts pre-date the incident.
AC says Jakes texts, threats before S was born are consistent, spread out over so much time that he threatened to take her away before she was even born.
AC says GW4 not being involved, the point is, like with Tabitha, when GW4 ran her off and took custody, the whole family was involved in that effort, just as they were when fighting for Jake to get custody by getting rid of Hanna.
Judge says he thinks its too early in their relationship to assume those disagreements could be considered part of the motive for murder.
AC is arguing that when Jake says "this child will always be with me" it indicates his mindset and how he controlled things after that regarding Sophia.
Last edited: