GUILTY PA - Matthew Mancuso for sex abuse, child *advertiser censored*, Pittsburgh, 2003

"After the pictures were taken, the girl was adopted by a Pittsburgh-area woman, although federal authorities in that city wouldn't say where the girl lives now."


I think that by saying she lives in the pittsburgh area- is actually TOO much info. No one needed to know where she was at all.
 
Sharon, I agree it is public information, and if you probably searched long enough, you could figure out the information. I am guessing the police just don't want to publish his nanme to protect her from others and especially maybe those freaks that her SOB adoptive father exposed her to.
 
2luvmy said:
Sharon, I agree it is public information, and if you probably searched long enough, you could figure out the information. I am guessing the police just don't want to publish his nanme to protect her from others and especially maybe those freaks that her SOB adoptive father exposed her to.
It didn't take too long.
I was able to find it. I hope he rots in hell. I really do.

Unfortunately I don't think the media will all keep quiet about who this person is.

I personally feel that the biggest mistake was giving out the info about the area in which she currently lives.
 
sharon25 said:
It didn't take too long.
I was able to find it. I hope he rots in hell. I really do.

Unfortunately I don't think the media will all keep quiet about who this person is.

I personally feel that the biggest mistake was giving out the info about the area in which she currently lives.

:( Sharon, I don't know what to say, that it was that easy for you pretty much means that it's going to be open season on that poor little girl. I can only pray that the people around her will protect her as much as possible because her life will again be a nightmare once people start finding out.
 
golfmom said:
:( Sharon, I don't know what to say, that it was that easy for you pretty much means that it's going to be open season on that poor little girl. I can only pray that the people around her will protect her as much as possible because her life will again be a nightmare once people start finding out.
I agree-

Should I post the part that makes me the most angry?
It would give details as to who the person is?
or should I just bite my tongue (or fingers in this case)
and not say anything???
 
sharon25 said:
I agree-

Should I post the part that makes me the most angry?
It would give details as to who the person is?
or should I just bite my tongue (or fingers in this case)
and not say anything???

Bite tongue hard! With the power of google that would leave another bread crumb out there for someone to find info.

Keep in mind she's high school age too and kids are very computer proficient these days.
 
I LOVE the sentencing guideline that forced him to create a $200,000 trust for her WHOO-HOO!!


I wish ,however,that there was a law that made it illegal to adopt or "import"(let's face that's what he did) a child for illegal purposes however.

I cant belive he ,a single man ,was able to adopt.
Ive known married couples who went through hell trying to adopt Russian children,spents thousands,and came back empty handed.

It appears he's wealthy so I guess he bribed whoever he had too.
 
It figures that he has money.
I don't really care about what his name is, I hopefully wouldn't know him anyway. But could someone post the details of his sentencing? I saw that he had to establish a trust for the little girl. But what was the rest of his sentence? Has he been designated a sexual offender and to what level?
 
mysteriew said:
It figures that he has money.
I don't really care about what his name is, I hopefully wouldn't know him anyway. But could someone post the details of his sentencing? I saw that he had to establish a trust for the little girl. But what was the rest of his sentence? Has he been designated a sexual offender and to what level?

he's not scheduled to be released until 2017.
As far as I know, he's NOT designated a sexual offender.
I'm not sure just what exactly the pictures were of,
if it only included the girl and not the girl participating in sexual acts.

Maybe that's why he's not labled a sex offender???

Also- I've read conflicting reports about when the pictures were taken.
in some articles it says the pictures were taken when the child was 5-7.
and in other reports it says that the pictures at Disney were taken in 2001.

???

I hope that this young woman can find peace in her life and move on. I really do.
 
What a waste of oxygen, that SOB!
It's a good thing I'll never get my hands on this guy, because if I could I guarantee I'd be going hell with him after what I do to him!!!

As usual, if you have enough money you can basically do whatever you want in our world.
If he is already in jail on charges then he'll probably have to register as a sex offender when he is released right?
 
sharon25 said:
he's not scheduled to be released until 2017.
As far as I know, he's NOT designated a sexual offender.
I'm not sure just what exactly the pictures were of,
if it only included the girl and not the girl participating in sexual acts.

Maybe that's why he's not labled a sex offender???

Also- I've read conflicting reports about when the pictures were taken.
in some articles it says the pictures were taken when the child was 5-7.
and in other reports it says that the pictures at Disney were taken in 2001.

???

I hope that this young woman can find peace in her life and move on. I really do.

The abuse began at age 5 when she was adopted and ended ,I guess ,when she was around 13.
In the DisneyWorld pics she about 9 or 10.
There are over 200 images on the Internet of her beginning at age 5 on up.

He raped her in everyway possible DAILY and took photos.

I belive the pics he was caught with were her posing sexually but there are pics of him "involved".

He was charged with producing and distributing child *advertiser censored*. But ,I guess because the pics the FBI found didn't include him he,at that time,wasn't charged w/ molestation (thereby making him ,legally,a "sex offender")

Likely now,however,he will be charged as such and Ive heard the charges in Florida will bring him a LIFE SENTENCE!
 
messiecake said:
The abuse began at age 5 when she was adopted and ended ,I guess ,when she was around 13.
In the DisneyWorld pics she about 9 or 10.
There are over 200 images on the Internet of her beginning at age 5 on up.

He raped her in everyway possible DAILY and took photos.

I belive the pics he was caught with were her posing sexually but there are pics of him "involved".

He was charged with producing and distributing child *advertiser censored*. But ,I guess because the pics the FBI found didn't include him he,at that time,wasn't charged w/ molestation (thereby making him ,legally,a "sex offender")

Likely now,however,he will be charged as such and Ive heard the charges in Florida will bring him a LIFE SENTENCE!
I hope that they extradite (sp?) him to florida.
From what I know of his whereabouts currently
he's basically on a little vacation.
not doing "Real" hard prison time.

:furious: :banghead: :furious: :banghead: :furious: :banghead: :furious: :banghead:
 
sharon25 said:
I hope that they extradite (sp?) him to florida.
From what I know of his whereabouts currently
he's basically on a little vacation.
not doing "Real" hard prison time.

:furious: :banghead: :furious: :banghead: :furious: :banghead: :furious: :banghead:

I take it that this guy is a public figure in some way or someone who would have influence? (financially, politically, etc) as well as having money?
I hope they extradite him!
In other cases they have labeled kiddie *advertiser censored* producers as sex offenders, even when they can't prove molestation of the child. But I do know that in a lot of states the hearing of -if this person will be labeled as a sex offender or not, is held until right before they get out of prison. So I guess that there is still a possibility that he will end up in the database yet.
I still hope Fla charges him.
 
new updates

On April 27 they publicized the picture of a dark-haired young girl, reclining on a couch, whom authorities described as a possible witness.

Irwin says she has been identified as a friend of the victim while in Pennsylvania, but that she no longer lives there.

Investigators believed the couch on which she was shown sitting was the same used in photos -- albeit in another location -- of the blonde girl posing sexually. Investigators said they did not know where the photo of the dark-haired girl was taken, whether she witnessed any acts of abuse or was a victim herself.

Authorities said they also found the image of the dark-haired girl on child *advertiser censored* Web sites, but she was not photographed inappropriately. They did not say specifically what the girl may know. She appeared to be about 11.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/05/13/child.*advertiser censored*/index.html

...was arrested in Pittsburgh two years ago on federal child-*advertiser censored* charges and is serving a 15-year prison sentence.

"I think he should die in prison," said Lt. Matt Irwin of the Orange County Sheriff's Sex Crimes Unit. "If his sentence is anything short of that, he should be prosecuted here in Orlando."


http://www.orlandosentinel.com/orl-asecporn14051405may14,0,6419966.story?coll=orl-home-headlines

U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan of Pittsburgh confirmed Friday that the girl's former adoptive father is a 46-year-old former resident of Plum Borough, a suburb about 15 miles east of that city. Last year, he was sentenced to 15 years, 8 months in prison for coercing the girl to appear in pornographic photos found on a computer diskette in his house.

Buchanan said the man also was sentenced to fund a $200,000 trust for the girl under the Protect Act, a 2003 law that strengthened sentencing guidelines in cases involving the exploitation of children.

Buchanan said federal authorities in Pittsburgh weren't aware of the Disney World pictures when they prosecuted the girl's father, but said authorities in Florida could prosecute the man if they had evidence that he took the photos

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationw...,0,7693532.story?coll=sns-ap-nation-headlines
 
Agents questioned the girl, who told them the father had sexually abused her, Buchanan said. They then immediately placed the girl in a foster home, and after she was adopted by a family, they moved her out of Pennsylvania.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/05/14/*advertiser censored*.child/index.html
 
I was biting my tongue until this $#%^ name showed up in more places.. and it has.

My biggest question is Why is he in a medical/mental facility instead of the normal prison???
 
mysteriew said:
I take it that this guy is a public figure in some way or someone who would have influence? (financially, politically, etc) as well as having money?
I hope they extradite him!
In other cases they have labeled kiddie *advertiser censored* producers as sex offenders, even when they can't prove molestation of the child. But I do know that in a lot of states the hearing of -if this person will be labeled as a sex offender or not, is held until right before they get out of prison. So I guess that there is still a possibility that he will end up in the database yet.
I still hope Fla charges him.
apparently there were pictures of him actually raping the poor girl.
So he would Have to be labeled right???

God Bless that girl. I just hope and pray that she can have a "Normal" life now..
 
golfmom said:
Quote from previously linked article:The suspect adopted the Russian-born girl when she was 5, Irwin said.
How was it possible for this guy to adopt a child?
When my first husband & I adopted our daughters, we had to go through extensive checks on everything in our lives. We had to have references & psychological evaluations. We had home visits where they checked out every room. Our very private life was examined as well as daily activities, hobbies, interests. A check into any criminal behavior & credit.
I'm not complaining...it was worth it & we had nothing to hide. :) I just don't understand how he was able to adopt this poor child & I wonder if they did any follow up visits. We had follow up visits after both the adoptions. The judge even asked our first daughter when she was 5 1/2 years old (we were adopting the second daughter at that time), out of our presence, alot of questions about her life with us. Did anyone do this for this little girl? Did anyone notice how unhappy she was? She must have been in school & around other relatives. :confused: I don't understand how no one noticed how miserable she must have been. Well, I guess I can. I was once a miserable little girl & no one knew why I was so unbearably unhappy. Not even my parents. :( I did tell my mom but she just didn't understand what I was trying to say. I know I didn't understand what was happening.

I know this is probably a really stupid question, but how do you hide being such a sick evil person like that?
 
sharon25 said:
I was biting my tongue until this $#%^ name showed up in more places.. and it has.

My biggest question is Why is he in a medical/mental facility instead of the normal prison???

I'm shocked. :silenced:
What the sob did is ... and he should ... well I'd be banned if I said what we should do.
Hopefully there is a public outcry and true justice will be served.
 
madgallico said:
When my first husband & I adopted our daughters, we had to go through extensive checks on everything in our lives. We had to have references & psychological evaluations. We had home visits where they checked out every room. Our very private life was examined as well as daily activities, hobbies, interests. A check into any criminal behavior & credit.
I'm not complaining...it was worth it & we had nothing to hide. :) I just don't understand how he was able to adopt this poor child & I wonder if they did any follow up visits. We had follow up visits after both the adoptions. The judge even asked our first daughter when she was 5 1/2 years old (we were adopting the second daughter at that time), out of our presence, alot of questions about her life with us. Did anyone do this for this little girl? Did anyone notice how unhappy she was? She must have been in school & around other relatives. :confused: I don't understand how no one noticed how miserable she must have been. Well, I guess I can. I was once a miserable little girl & no one knew why I was so unbearably unhappy. Not even my parents. :( I did tell my mom but she just didn't understand what I was trying to say. I know I didn't understand what was happening.

I know this is probably a really stupid question, but how do you hide being such a sick evil person like that?


He bought her from Russia and foreign adoptions depend how how much money you're willing to pay and how long you'll wait while you wade through the red tape.

You'd like to think when you adopt a child from overseas you would have some sort of follow up here but you dont.

You buy your baby and are free to do as you please-no questions!

Sick and evil people do not look it on the outside.
I gurantee this man was good looking,charming and intelligent.He was also wealthy.These factors gave him cart blanch *AND* I will bet money there's been other little girls,imo.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
90
Guests online
4,074
Total visitors
4,164

Forum statistics

Threads
593,580
Messages
17,989,417
Members
229,167
Latest member
just_a_shouthern_gal
Back
Top