TX - Hailey Dunn, 13, murdered, Scurry County, Dec 2010 *Arrest in 2021, released in 2023* #4

Sorry to post twice in a row like this, but I came across the following link which offers some explanation for the above:
April can notcome fast enuf!
 
Pretrial Motion – Motion for Discovery of Evidence of Extraneous Offenses
In November 2022, Adkins filed a request for timely notice of the state’s intention to use evidence of extraneous misconduct at trial.

Pretrial Motion No. 1 for Discovery – 911 and Radio
In November 2022, Powell made a motion for Discovery to review all 911 calls related to Adkins’ murder indictment and also a copy of the “Radio Call Master” or “Radio Call Log”

Pretrial Motion No. 2 for Discovery – Autopsy and Medical
In November 2022, Powell made a motion for Discovery to review all autopsy reports from the body of Hailey Dunn and all medical reports that showed the physical condition of Hailey or Adkins at the time of the alleged murder. He also asked to review the blood types of Hailey Dunn and Adkins.

Pretrial Motion No. 3 for Discovery – “Confession” Material
In November 2022, Powell made a motion for Discovery to review all confessions, admission, and statements in writing signed by Adkins in connection to the Hailey Dunn murder. He also requested any statements that were recorded by investigators and any statements made by Adkins before the Grand Jury.

Pretrial Motion No. 4 for Discovery – Other Suspects
In November 2022, Powell made a Motion for Discovery to review the name of all suspects who were interrogated and/or arrested in conjunction with the Hailey Dunn murder.

Pretrial Motion No. 5 for Discovery – Photographs
In November 2022, Powell made a Motion for Discovery to review all photographs, drawings, and charts made by prosecutors and/or investigators, all photographs of Hailey Dunn at the crime scene and during autopsy, all negative prints developed by prosecutors and/or investigators, all photographs of suspects that were shown to witnesses, and all photographs of Adkins used in connection to this investigation, including photographs that may have been shown to witnesses.

Pretrial Motion No. 6 for Discovery – Informants
In November 2022, Powell made a Motion for Discovery to review all information investigators received about the Hailey Dunn homicide through Crime Stoppers or similar programs.

Pretrial Motion No. 7 for Discovery – Law Enforcement Notes
In November 2022, Powell made a Motion for Discovery to review all handwritten and typed notes from investigators throughout the case.

Pretrial Motion No. 8 for Discovery – Prosecution Experts
In November 2022, Powell made a Motion for Discovery to review all names and addresses of each person the State plans to use for expert opinion during trial.

Pretrial Motion No. 9 for Discovery – Tangible Things
In November 2022, Powell made a Motion for Discovery to review all tangible property alleged by the State to have been taken or used by Adkins or any co-conspirator during the commission of the murder of Hailey Dunn, all weapons alleged by the State to have been used in the murder, all articles of clothing allegedly belonging to Adkins and Hailey Dunn, all contraband drugs, controlled substances, and paraphernalia seized during the case, all documents, papers, books, accounts, letters, objects, and tangible things that belong to Adkins and are currently in the possession of prosecutors and/or investigators.

Defendant’s Election for the Jury to Assess Punishment
In November 2022, Adkins officially elected to have a jury assess his punishment upon conviction.

Pretrial Motion for the Production of Grand Jury Transcripts Pursuant to Article 20.02(d) C.C.P.
In November 2022, Adkins moved obtain and review any transcripts, documents, power points, witness testimony, and exhibits presented to grand jurors that help lead to his indictment in this case.

Pretrial Matter Defendant’s Request for Discovery as Authorized by Article 39.14 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure
In November 2022, Adkins requested the State produce discovery of legally discoverable but previously undisclosed materials. This includes law enforcement records, records on consent to search, statements made by Adkins, witnesses, codefendants, video and audio recordings, electronic data, books, accounts, and letters, photographs and drawings, biological materisal, autopsy reports, list of witness, records of criminal conviction of Adkins and all other codefendants, accomplices, and witnesses, all records involving Adkins’ juvenile criminal history, all evidence related to extraneous misconduct of Adkins, and all tangible things involved in the case.

Pretrial Matter Request for Timely Notice of the State’s Intention to Use Evidence of Extraneous Misconduct at Trial

Pretrial Matter Defendant’s First Amended Request for Discovery as Authorized by Article 39.14 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure

In November 2022, Adkins requested the State produce discovery of legally discoverable but previously undisclosed materials. This includes law enforcement records, records on consent to search, statements made by Adkins, witnesses, codefendants, video and audio recordings, electronic data, books, accounts, and letters, photographs and drawings, biological materisal, autopsy reports, list of witness, records of criminal conviction of Adkins and all other codefendants, accomplices, and witnesses, all records involving Adkins’ juvenile criminal history, all evidence related to extraneous misconduct of Adkins, and all tangible things involved in the case.

Motion for Change of Venue
In November 2022, Adkins requested a Change of Venue from Nolan County, Texas because he believes “there exists knowledge and conclusion as to Adkins’ guilt or innocence and that these conclusions influence public opinion to the degree that Adkins cannot obtain a fair and impartial trial.” A witness, identified as a 36-year-old Nolan County resident, also provided a statement saying he believes that there is great prejudice in Nolan County and that Adkins cannot obtain a fair and impartial trial. He cites media coverage of this crime as a reason why.

Pretrial Matter First Amended Request for Timely Notice of the State’s Intention to Use Evidence of Extraneous Misconduct at Trial

Pretrial Matter Defendant’s Second Amended Request for Discovery as Authorized by Article 39.14 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure

In November 2022, Adkins requested the State produce discovery of legally discoverable but previously undisclosed materials. This includes law enforcement records, records on consent to search, statements made by Adkins, witnesses, codefendants, video and audio recordings, electronic data, books, accounts, and letters, photographs and drawings, biological materisal, autopsy reports, list of witness, records of criminal conviction of Adkins and all other codefendants, accomplices, and witnesses, all records involving Adkins’ juvenile criminal history, all evidence related to extraneous misconduct of Adkins, and all tangible things involved in the case.

 
Matt Powell is an experienced and aggressive litigator who has protected clients his entire career.

Matt joins Payne, Powell, Truitt & Chandler after a distinguished career as the Criminal District Attorney for Lubbock County, Texas. During his time as District Attorney, Matt fought for thousands of victims and was their voice when they had no voice.

During his time as a prosecutor, Matt tried over 300 jury trials, including approximately 60 murder cases and 17 capital murder cases. He never lost a felony case. Not only did he handle criminal cases but he was also the chief counsel for Lubbock County, where he managed all civil lawsuits, contracts and other legal issues pertaining to Lubbock County.

Matt's cases and work have been featured on NBC Dateline, ABC 20/20, 48 hours, Forensic Files, Investigative Discovery, Solved, Crime Watch Daily and various other programs.

For his work protecting clients, Matt has been awarded numerous recognitions including, The State Bar of Texas Prosecutor of the year, The Association against Sexual Assaults, Harry Cottle Justice Award, and the MADD Prosecutor of the year.

Matt has a servant's heart and has volunteered his time with the Lubbock Area United Way, University Medical Center Foundation, Make-A-Wish, Family Guidance and Outreach and the Children's Advocacy Center.

Matt has been an adjunct professor for the Texas Tech School of Law and Wayland University and has been a lecturer for the American and International Law Institute, the Association of Government Attorney's in Capital Litigation, the Texas District and County Attorney's Association and the National District Attorney's Association. Matt has also spoken to thousands of lawyers on the use of Courtroom Technology.


A former DA ... look at this guy's resume - impressive!! This can't be cheap, who the heck is footing the defense bill?

 
I really hope the prosecution has an airtight case. I am a tad bit nervous about them saying they think she was murdered on December 26th, and only Shawn has been arrested so far. How are they going to prove he acted alone in this....
I wouldn't be surprised if BJO gets thrown under the bus by the defense team.
 
Pretrial Motion – Motion for Discovery of Evidence of Extraneous Offenses
In November 2022, Adkins filed a request for timely notice of the state’s intention to use evidence of extraneous misconduct at trial.

What is extraneous offense evidence? Extraneous evidence is evidence of another crime, wrong or bad act that is not relevant to proving the specific allegation made in the charging instrument, information or indictment. For example, a prior unrelated DWI conviction would be an extraneous crime in an arson case.

Texas courts generally recognize that extraneous offense evidence is any act of prior misconduct not shown in the charging indictment or information. This misconduct does not have to have resulted in a conviction. There is no significant difference between an extraneous bad act and an extraneous offense.


This motion was the most interesting to me. I can think of several things which the State might be trying to get into evidence that the defense is going to object too. Clint's PI has mentioned SA was sending interesting text messages to females. And there's the ever controversial CP which was supposedly found, but he was never charged for. But who knows, there is likely more we know nothing about.

@Truth Prevails - do you think the mention of "codefendants" in many of the motions is just common legal language used so as not to exclude any possible material?
 
Last edited:

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
66
Guests online
2,267
Total visitors
2,333

Forum statistics

Threads
593,425
Messages
17,986,961
Members
229,131
Latest member
Migrant
Back
Top