Hi Sleuthser.
I hope you will help me with a few extra eyes on this case.
I stumbled upon this Jane doe. from 2013 NY.
1539UFNY
And the distinctive pig necklace. Which in many ways is identical to the on Kristina Nguyen from Ohio has on, in her age reconstruction image. I know if you look at the date of her disappearance she was only about 4 years old. Jane doe was about 20 years old and up was there thought. But could something have happened later?
20 years, is however stated as an estimate, based on the perception that Jane doe may have been born in one of the Chinese pig years 1971 or 1985. But kristina she was born in 1997 an still have a pig necklace. I have read that the pig can be a sign of motherhood, happiness, wealth and other things. And would make sense as in connection with childbirth.?
It is believed that Jane may have been lying on the site as early as 2012. kristina would have been 15, in 2012.
I dont know enough of this type of necklaces, and Asian tradition, to know if this could be an all man's possession during that period? But I think it seems weird that a girl has disappeared years ago with a similar necklace which is now also found on a Jane doe that no one has clamed? I can see from the age-old reconstruction of kristina that the pig is black. But i see in the picture of kristina as a child she is obviously wearing a necklace. Which appears to be gold and not black. Could an artist have drawn it black, because he or she did not have knowledge of it, from Christina's family?
Does anyone have more knowledge about these cases?
Anyone know if the 2 cases have been compared before?
What are your thoughts on this?