Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, that's what I said before - her reactions could have been genuine but it doesn't mean she's innocent.If you're upset enough you can be sick. Even if the upset is brought on yourself....
Exactly. It's a poor argument for the defence.I don't doubt some of the emotion was real, it was still her son. But I believe it was dramatised by adding worry, stress and anxiety of facing arrest and prosecution.
Exactly. She could have been dry heaving and vomiting because she was truly scared of the circumstances--knowing they might be arrested anytime.That's not the point though. She would have been genuinely stressed out by everything that had happened. That doesn't prove her innocence.
I think he should also try and give an explanation for the lights and the curtains moving. He seemed to mention it and kind of brush it off---but it needs some kind of reasonable explanation....but there might not be any.Oh OK.
Mr Rouch is getting a momentum now tearing into JC.
But JC also said these lies to his gaming companion who testified in Court.The trouble with what he is saying are some of JCs lies is that he never actually said them in police interviews or on the stand. AW was the one who made claims re the SAS and the 99 year sentence. There is no evidence of him saying that except for AWs word and she has also demonstrated that she tells lies.
I know---that is odd.The trouble with what he is saying are some of JCs lies is that he never actually said them in police interviews or on the stand. AW was the one who made claims re the SAS and the 99 year sentence. There is no evidence of him saying that except for AWs word and she has also demonstrated that she tells lies.
Exactly. She could have been dry heaving and vomiting because she was truly scared of the circumstances--knowing they might be arrested anytime.
We should give Mr R time.AW's defense is don't let the fact that the lights went on and off in Logan's bedroom when she claimed to be asleep and yet she was the only person in the house make you think that her reaction on the body cam footage was fake. That's pathetic.
I think part of the problem is we are only getting little snippets of the closing statements. It makes it seem very disjointed but it might be more cohesive than it seems when we just get it in little bits and pieces.AW's defense is don't let the fact that the lights went on and off in Logan's bedroom when she claimed to be asleep and yet she was the only person in the house make you think that her reaction on the body cam footage was fake. That's pathetic.
I think part of the problem is we are only getting little snippets of the closing statements. It makes it seem very disjointed but it might be more cohesive than it seems when we just get it in little bits and pieces.
The trouble with what he is saying are some of JCs lies is that he never actually said them in police interviews or on the stand. AW was the one who made claims re the SAS and the 99 year sentence. There is no evidence of him saying that except for AWs word and she has also demonstrated that she tells lies.