A pretty young and yes, Caucasian mother,(let's be honest), the surrounding circumstances, a dog in tow, various factors made public through family and LE, etc. In my opinion of course.
But what is clear is that no amount of media coverage alters the outcome, Corrie in all likelihood ended up in the landfill, NB is in the water imo.
NB was self-employed, with no obligation to have 2 phones.
Yes, especially as she had two Facebook accounts, one personal and one mortgage business. And she was also working for Love Homes or I Love Homes and Love Park Homes/I Love Park Homes (See Companies House) so many balls to juggle On one phone.
I'd add a fifth, she was assaulted and pushed into the water which killed her and the body was removed in the one and a half hour window before the police came.
NB was on the phone with the company that contracted her.
Not possible to be swept away . The sonar equipment guy explained how the water was quite shallow ,still and not fast running at that point .
I know all about the Apple and FBI shenanigans, but I'm also aware of the skills the police in the UK have with phone examination when the cost of it can be justified. However, in this case I'm fairly sure that the passcode would have been available. They could see the last text message and the Teams meeting quite rapidly."Checking the in-built motion sensors"
The sensors don't store any information whatsoever.
The article assumes full access to the phone - ie passcode/password. Without that, the information is encrypted and inaccessible.
It seems that either because the phone was found unlocked or somebody such as PA knew the passcode/password then there has been the ability to retrieve information, but in the absence of that, there is no way to access the data.
Some high-profile examples of this where even Apple couldn't (or wouldn't) access the encrypted data on iPhones despite FBI requests.
Apple–FBI encryption dispute - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
He also said it was about a foot higher than on the day of his searching so it does seem possible there would have been some flow. It is only a small river and a foot extra is quite a significant amount of water.
metro.co.uk
MS Teams is different, the IT administrator of the company that hosted the MS Teams call can see all the Teams data logs - I'm a sysadmin and can access literally everything my company employees do on Teams including private messages, calls, meetings etc without any access to their mobile phones.
Please explain to me if a Teams meeting shows the boss and colleagues in an office or can he hold that meeting from home, away on other business. I only vaguely know Zoom meetings. In other words would participants know where the meeting was initiated?
Or stumbling upon a crime?
That would be very surprising that a mortgage advisor's disappearance was related to national security. What known facts about this case supports that?
With 40 detectives on the job I cannot believe they are just sitting around awaiting for the body to appear.
I'd be very surprised. I thought of poor Dr David Kelly when I read this
They wouldn't know that was the last text if only on the recipient had knowledge of it.
Totally agree. It’s unwittingly a slur on the lost person. Like those who say if you are strong-willed enough you will beat terminal cancer.
