ok I am new to this thread and it's all so confusing it's hard to fully understand it and it's too much to read all the threads, but I just have a few simple questions. If I am too confused please just tell me to go away.
It was the texty kid's house he broke into - is that correct. Yes
If the jacket is hers then wouldn't that make texty no 1 suspect?? Not if someone planted that jacket during a break in. OR if the evidence was handled by WH (which he admits to). At best, the evidence is tainted and basically useless now. We can thank WH for that. If the police suspected he planted the jacket then wouldn't that make him the no 1 suspect?? Yes, it would. And imo, he is the number 1 suspect of LE. I guess what I'm saying is wouldn't it mean it's one or the other and therefore narrows the list of suspects down to either of them - I know that is a very simplified way of looking at things.
Has it been verified that the neighbor did see and wave to AJ after 2pm the day she went missing? No. plus I find the fact this nieghbour says they saw her car driving towards home and then a minute later a white car was seen driving in the same direction (this doesn't mean she was being followed by this white) - a minute in driving terms is over a mile away. I guess I ask about these sightings because the way WH describes their lunch meeting is very weird. They meet and spend over half an hour together yet say nothing much because his family is not very talkative according to him. If that was the case then 5 mins would have been enough for him to give her money. Then he gets back late and gets in trouble from his boss. in total he is away for about 1hr and 20 mins for lunch, all to just hand over some money - this is why to me the sightings afterwards are very important.
And finally, if I read the interview correctly it seems some old lady rang him and told him about the clothes on the road (is that right it was some lady?) - he says they rang the police, left a voicemail message and because no one rang back she called him and that's why he went searching. did I get all that correct. If so it would be strange to contact police and if you don't hear anything wouldn't you just call them back - it just seems strange that a stranger would call a parent directly about something like clothes on the side of the road that could belong to anybody.Mind you all of this information comes from WH, and he is a proven liar. We have no confirmation of any of this from LE.
Maybe I'm just too confused and have all this wrong. Please tell me to go away if I'm wasting people's time.
