• #1,101
I thought a different judge OK'ed the change of venue. So I wonder if judge Hein is against this and will "fight" it?
IIRC, Judge Hein wanted the change of venue. It was the victim's families who had AC appeal it. They lost, so I think its up to Hein now.

 
  • #1,102
IIRC, Judge Hein wanted the change of venue. It was the victim's families who had AC appeal it. They lost, so I think its up to Hein now.


I recall this being reported in November 2024, but didn't Judge Hein rule on this illegally -- after failing to first consult with the victims?

More recently, (2/9/26), it's been reported that the trial location remains undecided.

My heart remains heavy, especially for the Rhoden matriarch. :(

2/9/26

Discussions about a possible trial date in October and juror interviews regarding the death penalty took place, but the trial location remains undecided.

Wagner's lawyers confirmed no plea deals have been offered, and Billy Wagner was seen shaking his head in court when the subject arose.


 
  • #1,103
I recall this being reported in November 2024, but didn't Judge Hein rule on this illegally -- after failing to first consult with the victims?

More recently, (2/9/26), it's been reported that the trial location remains undecided.

My heart remains heavy, especially for the Rhoden matriarch. :(

Yes, as the most recent article mentions, the appeals court let stand Judge Hein's decision about change of venue. He just hasn't decided where to move the trial. The courts overturned his other decisions about removing the DP from Billy's charges.
 
  • #1,104
I recall this being reported in November 2024, but didn't Judge Hein rule on this illegally -- after failing to first consult with the victims?

More recently, (2/9/26), it's been reported that the trial location remains undecided.

My heart remains heavy, especially for the Rhoden matriarch. :(
He heard arguments in April 2025, and I thought that was for him to reconsider and announce another decision, even if it is that the trial will be moved. I must have missed something along the way if he decided it a 2nd time and the court of appeals agreed with him. Maybe he did decide again (which I must have missed) that it will be moved after hearing arguments. It sounds like he just needs to announce where?
 
  • #1,105
Yes, as the most recent article mentions, the appeals court let stand Judge Hein's decision about change of venue. He just hasn't decided where to move the trial. The courts overturned his other decisions about removing the DP from Billy's charges.
IMO, moving the trial after so many years will not benefit BW. It will only inconvenience the family and friends. Haven't they been through enough??? Is mama Rhoden still living??
 
  • #1,106
IMO, moving the trial after so many years will not benefit BW. It will only inconvenience the family and friends. Haven't they been through enough??? Is mama Rhoden still living??
Yes, I believe she still is, though in poor health.
 
  • #1,107
This is the appeal filed with the Supreme Court to have Billy's Death Penalty specifications dismissed.
Judge Hein had dismissed the DP. The state filed with Court of appeals to have it reinstated and that was granted. Now Billy's lawyers are asking the Supreme Court to dismiss again. If the Supreme Courts agrees to take the case and he did happen to win, could the State then file an appeal with the Supreme Court?
 

Attachments

Last edited:
  • #1,108
This is the appeal filed with the Supreme Court to have Billy's Death Penalty specifications dismissed.
Judge Hein had dismissed the DP. The state filed with Court of appeals to have it reinstated and that was granted. Now Billy's lawyers are asking the Supreme Court to dismiss again. If the Supreme Courts agrees to take the case and he did happen to win, could the State then file an appeal with the Supreme Court?

I do believe the Supreme Court is the last stop on this long train ride. Hopefully they keep this multiple murderer's
DP in place then this new judge (didn't Hein leave) can set trial dates.
 
  • #1,109
I do believe the Supreme Court is the last stop on this long train ride. Hopefully they keep this multiple murderer's
DP in place then this new judge (didn't Hein leave) can set trial dates.
Dang I wish Hein had left, he has not that I have heard of. Will Canepa be able to also appeal to the Supreme Court if they did happen to rule in favor of Billy?
 
  • #1,110
This must mean even more delays, it seems never ending
 
  • #1,111
This must mean even more delays, it seems never ending
If the Supreme Court will take the appeal and review it, no telling how long it will take them to hand down a decision. If they did rule in Billy's favor, I am not sure if Canepa can file an appeal also or ask the court to reconsider it again or how that works.
 
  • #1,112
Dang I wish Hein had left, he has not that I have heard of. Will Canepa be able to also appeal to the Supreme Court if they did happen to rule in favor of Billy?


May 16, 2024
The US Supreme Court is the highest court in the land, meaning it has authority over all other courts within the United States. As there is no court in the United States with more authority than the US Supreme Court, a Supreme Court ruling cannot be overturned by any other court, though the Supreme Court can overturn its own rulings.

This happens when a ruling is issued and then, years later, a similar case comes to the court and the court changes its opinion. One of the most famous examples of a Supreme Court case being overturned is Plessy v. Ferguson, which was overturned by the ruling in Brown v. Board of Education.


Published Jul 19, 2025
Decisions made by the United States Supreme Court cannot be appealed to another court. As the nation’s highest judicial body, its rulings on federal law are conclusive for the case in question. While a specific decision is final, the legal principles it establishes are not entirely beyond challenge.

Over time, there are limited pathways to change the law articulated by the Court, which focus on altering the legal landscape for future cases.
 
Last edited:
  • #1,113

May 16, 2024
The US Supreme Court is the highest court in the land, meaning it has authority over all other courts within the United States. As there is no court in the United States with more authority than the US Supreme Court, a Supreme Court ruling cannot be overturned by any other court, though the Supreme Court can overturn its own rulings.

This happens when a ruling is issued and then, years later, a similar case comes to the court and the court changes its opinion. One of the most famous examples of a Supreme Court case being overturned is Plessy v. Ferguson, which was overturned by the ruling in Brown v. Board of Education.


Published Jul 19, 2025
Decisions made by the United States Supreme Court cannot be appealed to another court. As the nation’s highest judicial body, its rulings on federal law are conclusive for the case in question. While a specific decision is final, the legal principles it establishes are not entirely beyond challenge.

Over time, there are limited pathways to change the law articulated by the Court, which focus on altering the legal landscape for future cases.
I

May 16, 2024
The US Supreme Court is the highest court in the land, meaning it has authority over all other courts within the United States. As there is no court in the United States with more authority than the US Supreme Court, a Supreme Court ruling cannot be overturned by any other court, though the Supreme Court can overturn its own rulings.

This happens when a ruling is issued and then, years later, a similar case comes to the court and the court changes its opinion. One of the most famous examples of a Supreme Court case being overturned is Plessy v. Ferguson, which was overturned by the ruling in Brown v. Board of Education.


Published Jul 19, 2025
Decisions made by the United States Supreme Court cannot be appealed to another court. As the nation’s highest judicial body, its rulings on federal law are conclusive for the case in question. While a specific decision is final, the legal principles it establishes are not entirely beyond challenge.

Over time, there are limited pathways to change the law articulated by the Court, which focus on altering the legal landscape for future cases.
I did know they can change their own rulings, but I was not sure if the State has a chance to appeal if the court did hand down a ruling in favor of Billy. It would seem unfair if she had to go to court of appeals first instead of Supreme Court and thendefense got to appeal to Supreme Court with no recourse for the State after that to be heard and considered. Thank you for posting that.
 
  • #1,114
I

I did know they can change their own rulings, but I was not sure if the State has a chance to appeal if the court did hand down a ruling in favor of Billy. It would seem unfair if she had to go to court of appeals first instead of Supreme Court and thendefense got to appeal to Supreme Court with no recourse for the State after that to be heard and considered. Thank you for posting that.

Your Welcome. Thanks for staying on this case and sharing court documents. I greatly appreciate it. And thanks for letting us know Jake was also sent out of State.

Maybe I mixed up the US Federal Supreme Court VS the Ohio State Supreme Court.

A State Supreme Court can appeal all the way up to the top - the US Federal Supreme Court.

I need to research this appeal part of the case all over again ... this court back-and-forth DP situation.

My brain is trying to make an escape.

2 Cents
 
Last edited:
  • #1,115
  • #1,116
I often think about the Pike County murders and with Earth Day approaching I can't help but think about the Rhodens and Hannah Gilley murders. My thoughts are with their families always.

1775083857457.png
mynbc5.com
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
109
Guests online
4,865
Total visitors
4,974

Forum statistics

Threads
645,740
Messages
18,847,370
Members
245,778
Latest member
Common Sense Prevails
Top