Under investigation is how he got a personal hand gun onto the premisesThought military personnel couldn't 'carry' on base ?
Or can sergeants and officers above that level carry their weapons.
Imo.
I heard at the press conference that prior DUI from May was unknown to his chain of command until this incident.Some more links :
![]()
Who Is Quornelius Radford? Fort Stewart, Georgia shooting suspect
The sprawling Army installation, about 40 miles southwest of Savannah, was placed on lockdown just after 11 a.m.www.newsweek.com
![]()
Who is Quornelius Radford? Fort Stewart Army base shooting suspect identified
Quornelius Radford has been identified as the suspect who opened fire at Fort Stewart, the U.S. Army base in Georgia. Radford is a 28-year-old Army sergeant.www.hindustantimes.com
What We Know About the Suspect
- Quornelius Radford is an Army sergeant.
- He is 28 years old.
- He has prior ties to Florida.
- He was previously arrested in May during a traffic stop for driving under the influence, according to CNN.
- He opened fire Wednesday morning at 10:56 a.m. in the area assigned to the 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team (2nd ABCT). He was taken into custody at 11:35 a.m.
oh no zero carry on base.Thought military personnel couldn't 'carry' on base ?
Or can sergeants and officers above that level carry their weapons.
Imo.
Nope a SGT is an E5 and likely was in the Army for 4 years or more. Most start at E1 or E2 and work their way up. E3 is Private first class (PFC), then E4 is specialist and E5 is SGT, which is the first non-commissioned officer (NCO) rank. This rank sees an increase in responsibility.At a rank of sergeant, he wasn't a newbie recruit (A private or private first class ? Sorry I'm not sure about rankings.) who snapped and decided he wanted out.
I'm wondering if it was a personal vendetta against some or all of whom he shot ?
Thank god they all survived !
What an evil act to commit amongst those who --in a battle situation or even just training exercise-- would probably have your back ?
Imo.
oh no zero carry on base.
I live on an Army base and my husband is a military police officer in the Army.
Those living on base can have their personal firearms in their residence and they need to be registered on base and stored in your home. For soldiers living in the barracks, they register their weapons and store them in the arms room. They are not allowed to store their personal firearms in their barracks rooms (sorta like a college dorm room). Hunting and shooting at the ranges or removing your firearms to go off base to utilize a range or to hunt are allowed and we are supposed to declare our weapons when we enter the base. This is no issue if they are stored in a case and the ammo is store separate from the weapon in the vehicle and again you must decare that you have your weapons and where they are. Then you return them to your home and store them.
No servicemembers are authorized to carry any personal firearm around during the work day. Only military police are armed and current local on duty LEOs can also carry on base.
So I'd say he either lived on base and just brought a gun from his house or if he lived off base he drove through the gate and didn't declare the weapon and just proceeded to do what he did.
He was legally aloud on base and likely just scanned in like every other day.
Really disappointing.![]()
Fort Stewart gunman named as Quornelius Radford
LIVE UPDATES: The Fort Stewart Army base in southeast Georgia has been urgently locked down after at least five people were shot this morning. The shooter struck the 2ABCT area of the base.www.dailymail.co.uk
View attachment 606537
Great way to throw your life away and any achievements, Quornelius.
That is odd since the MI corps has nothing to do with base security.On CNN right now, with Jake Tapper, the chyron says that the shooter had a “disagreement with one victim.”
Much more will be forthcoming, I imagine, but it sounds to me like another “injustice collector.”
As to why he shot multiple people, that is yet to be revealed.
Jake is asking a military intelligence officer if security procedures on bases need to be re-examined.
Then I may have misheard his title, or possibly it’s a case of getting whichever talking-head, knowledgeable military person they could gather on short notice .That is odd since the MI corps has nothing to do with base security.